Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Does Having 3 Core Books Hurt The Game?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="T. Foster" data-source="post: 3717787" data-attributes="member: 16574"><p>I've said about a thousand times, and will probably say about a thousand more, that D&D desperately needs a "casual edition" that comes in a single box including everything needed to play (1 or 2 rulebooks, sample intro adventure, dice, perhaps character sheet blanks), is streamlined and simplified enough that a player can start playing in 5 minutes and a DM can start running in a day or two, is open-ended enough that someone who wants to keep playing this version indefinitely can do so, but is also roughly compatible enough with the full/hobbyist version of the game that someone who wants more detail and options can switch over without having to completely relearn the game from scratch (or, with a little bit of effort, can mix and match elements between the two). Yes, I'm thinking of the early 80s split between Basic/Expert D&D and 1E AD&D (not the late 80s/90s split when the two lines became essentially redundant to each other, but specifically the 1981-83 "Moldvay" era where on the one hand you had D&D that was a simple-but-complete game for newbies and casual players, and on the other you had AD&D which was a more complicated cousin-game for more experienced and/or dedicated players, and while the two lines weren't totally compatible they were generally similar enough that if you "got" one you would probably get the other, and many people freely mixed and matched elements of both (consciously or otherwise)).</p><p></p><p>And yes, one of the reasons I'm saying this (besides the fact that I think it would make good business-sense) is self-serving -- even though I'm an "experienced and/or dedicated" gamer, I've decided that I don't want the full/complicated ruleset with all its options and detail and would be perfectly satisfied by (and in fact prefer) the casual/newbie version (assuming that, like B/X D&D, it would be open-ended and fully playable, not like the recent Basic Sets where you can play for about 2 sessions and then have to upgrade to the full version).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="T. Foster, post: 3717787, member: 16574"] I've said about a thousand times, and will probably say about a thousand more, that D&D desperately needs a "casual edition" that comes in a single box including everything needed to play (1 or 2 rulebooks, sample intro adventure, dice, perhaps character sheet blanks), is streamlined and simplified enough that a player can start playing in 5 minutes and a DM can start running in a day or two, is open-ended enough that someone who wants to keep playing this version indefinitely can do so, but is also roughly compatible enough with the full/hobbyist version of the game that someone who wants more detail and options can switch over without having to completely relearn the game from scratch (or, with a little bit of effort, can mix and match elements between the two). Yes, I'm thinking of the early 80s split between Basic/Expert D&D and 1E AD&D (not the late 80s/90s split when the two lines became essentially redundant to each other, but specifically the 1981-83 "Moldvay" era where on the one hand you had D&D that was a simple-but-complete game for newbies and casual players, and on the other you had AD&D which was a more complicated cousin-game for more experienced and/or dedicated players, and while the two lines weren't totally compatible they were generally similar enough that if you "got" one you would probably get the other, and many people freely mixed and matched elements of both (consciously or otherwise)). And yes, one of the reasons I'm saying this (besides the fact that I think it would make good business-sense) is self-serving -- even though I'm an "experienced and/or dedicated" gamer, I've decided that I don't want the full/complicated ruleset with all its options and detail and would be perfectly satisfied by (and in fact prefer) the casual/newbie version (assuming that, like B/X D&D, it would be open-ended and fully playable, not like the recent Basic Sets where you can play for about 2 sessions and then have to upgrade to the full version). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Does Having 3 Core Books Hurt The Game?
Top