Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does Innate Sorcery grant True Strike advantage?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 9779560" data-attributes="member: 7030563"><p>To start with, specific beats general, in the Truestrike spell the "attack" can cause Radiant damage and that overrides anything that would contradict in in the general section about attacks.</p><p></p><p>However the section on attacks does not contradict it, it acctually affirms it. You should the very combat rules you are referencing:</p><p></p><p>This from the section on Making an Attack: <em>"Some <strong>attacks cause</strong> special effects <strong>in addition to</strong> or instead of <strong>damage</strong>."</em></p><p></p><p>So yes "attacks" can cause damage according to the very rules you told me to read AND according to the Truestrike spell itself.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In Truestrike attacks cause damage. It is right there in the spell and the damage it causes defies the laws of physics.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The attack itself causes damage as per the Truestrike description. I think that means the attack causes damage when a hit occurs, but it is still the attack is causing it, as per the description.</p><p></p><p>Now if you want I suppose you could interpret that to mean the attack causes damage regardless a hit or on a miss. I don't think that is correct and I don't I think that is reasoable, but it is not specifically refuted.</p><p></p><p>What is not up to interpretation though is that the attack itself can cause the Radiant damage because it says that specifically in the spell. So the attack itself can defy the laws of physics, therefore by your logic it is part of the spell.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The "attack" can do Radiant damage.</p><p></p><p>And let's be clear you don't "change" anything. It does not say you can change the damage to Radiant it says you can <u>choose</u> for the damage of the attack (not of the hit or of the weapon) to be Radiant or the weapon's type. You don't replace or change anything.</p><p></p><p><em>"If the attack deals damage, it can be Radiant damage or the weapon’s normal damage type (your choice)."</em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That is not my claim. I never said attack=damage, I said the attack can cause Radiant damage because that is what the rules say. Also the section on Combat you referenced also says attacks can cause damage.</p><p></p><p>Attack does not equal damage, but attacks clearly can cause damage. </p><p></p><p>You can jump up and down and claim attacks can't cause damage, but both the general rules on combat and the specific rules on Truestrike say they can.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That would nto fly in my game but your game, your DM, do whatever you want.</p><p></p><p>None of this changes that fact that the rules say attacks can cause daamge and the truestrike spell says that attack can cause Radiant damage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 9779560, member: 7030563"] To start with, specific beats general, in the Truestrike spell the "attack" can cause Radiant damage and that overrides anything that would contradict in in the general section about attacks. However the section on attacks does not contradict it, it acctually affirms it. You should the very combat rules you are referencing: This from the section on Making an Attack: [I]"Some [B]attacks cause[/B] special effects [B]in addition to[/B] or instead of [B]damage[/B]."[/I] So yes "attacks" can cause damage according to the very rules you told me to read AND according to the Truestrike spell itself. In Truestrike attacks cause damage. It is right there in the spell and the damage it causes defies the laws of physics. The attack itself causes damage as per the Truestrike description. I think that means the attack causes damage when a hit occurs, but it is still the attack is causing it, as per the description. Now if you want I suppose you could interpret that to mean the attack causes damage regardless a hit or on a miss. I don't think that is correct and I don't I think that is reasoable, but it is not specifically refuted. What is not up to interpretation though is that the attack itself can cause the Radiant damage because it says that specifically in the spell. So the attack itself can defy the laws of physics, therefore by your logic it is part of the spell. The "attack" can do Radiant damage. And let's be clear you don't "change" anything. It does not say you can change the damage to Radiant it says you can [U]choose[/U] for the damage of the attack (not of the hit or of the weapon) to be Radiant or the weapon's type. You don't replace or change anything. [I]"If the attack deals damage, it can be Radiant damage or the weapon’s normal damage type (your choice)."[/I] That is not my claim. I never said attack=damage, I said the attack can cause Radiant damage because that is what the rules say. Also the section on Combat you referenced also says attacks can cause damage. Attack does not equal damage, but attacks clearly can cause damage. You can jump up and down and claim attacks can't cause damage, but both the general rules on combat and the specific rules on Truestrike say they can. That would nto fly in my game but your game, your DM, do whatever you want. None of this changes that fact that the rules say attacks can cause daamge and the truestrike spell says that attack can cause Radiant damage. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does Innate Sorcery grant True Strike advantage?
Top