Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 5586691" data-attributes="member: 42582">Nullzone, with the Supreme Court examle they did what a court does when its member disagree - put it to the vote.In the case of D&D, though, we don't have an authoritative tribunal. So while I agree with you that discussion is worthwhile, for getting a better handle on what the rule is for and why it is written as it is (which might include working out why it is badly written!), I think the  quest for certainty, or the insistence by some (not necessarily you!) that there is (always?) a definite or unarguable answer, is mistaken.</blockquote>