Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does Opportunity Action + MBA = Opportunity Attack?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DracoSuave" data-source="post: 5376056" data-attributes="member: 71571"><p>They didn't want to, because they wanted those bonuses only to apply to the Opportunity Attack action, and the triggers that make it work. I figured that was obvious. They have a specific thing, and bonuses and effects that key off of only that specific thing... and they did that on purpose... it's reasonable to assume they wanted it that way by design.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Then you can see why it is the way it is.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>1- As an aside, I dislike the 'these are not idiots' defense. It seems to be used to justify all sorts of behavior, such as never cracking over the book, and never making an attempt to understand the rules. I never claimed it was a matter of idiocy... it's a matter of ignorance and that's a completely different thing.</p><p></p><p>2- If all they have to go by is just looking at numbers on their character sheet... then they're just learning the rules by hearsay. And my point still stands; they don't understand the rule, and they're relying on explanation first, rather than 'just go read it' followed by an explanation.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Obscure enough to have two separate index entries, one under triggered action types and the other under specific actions... the latter entry refering to the former entry in that Opportunty Attacks are explicitly described as Opportunity Actions, and under Opportunity Actions, Opportunity Attacks are described as one type of them all players have.</p><p></p><p>It's actually pretty clear. Both refer to each other as distinct kinds of game elements.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I've seen some of the things you believe the rules do. Have you tried pointing out the rules in the book, especially to these players who have been playing for years and can understand how rule books are written? Hell, these players have been dealing with obtuse rules such as ability modifiers to varying saving throws, 3rd edition polymorphs, THAC0, the word 'level,' attack modifiers based on weapon and armor class (before dexterity adjustment), the rules for psionics, the other rules for psionics, the other other rules for psionics, the other other other rules for psionics, and so on and so forth. </p><p></p><p>In comparison, something that can be resolved simply by explaining 'This is a type of action, and this is a specific action of that type' isn't obtuse.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DracoSuave, post: 5376056, member: 71571"] They didn't want to, because they wanted those bonuses only to apply to the Opportunity Attack action, and the triggers that make it work. I figured that was obvious. They have a specific thing, and bonuses and effects that key off of only that specific thing... and they did that on purpose... it's reasonable to assume they wanted it that way by design. Then you can see why it is the way it is. 1- As an aside, I dislike the 'these are not idiots' defense. It seems to be used to justify all sorts of behavior, such as never cracking over the book, and never making an attempt to understand the rules. I never claimed it was a matter of idiocy... it's a matter of ignorance and that's a completely different thing. 2- If all they have to go by is just looking at numbers on their character sheet... then they're just learning the rules by hearsay. And my point still stands; they don't understand the rule, and they're relying on explanation first, rather than 'just go read it' followed by an explanation. Obscure enough to have two separate index entries, one under triggered action types and the other under specific actions... the latter entry refering to the former entry in that Opportunty Attacks are explicitly described as Opportunity Actions, and under Opportunity Actions, Opportunity Attacks are described as one type of them all players have. It's actually pretty clear. Both refer to each other as distinct kinds of game elements. I've seen some of the things you believe the rules do. Have you tried pointing out the rules in the book, especially to these players who have been playing for years and can understand how rule books are written? Hell, these players have been dealing with obtuse rules such as ability modifiers to varying saving throws, 3rd edition polymorphs, THAC0, the word 'level,' attack modifiers based on weapon and armor class (before dexterity adjustment), the rules for psionics, the other rules for psionics, the other other rules for psionics, the other other other rules for psionics, and so on and so forth. In comparison, something that can be resolved simply by explaining 'This is a type of action, and this is a specific action of that type' isn't obtuse. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does Opportunity Action + MBA = Opportunity Attack?
Top