Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does Opportunity Action + MBA = Opportunity Attack?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5376080" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>No, actually I can't see why it is this way at all DS. It has BECOME codified as a meaningful distinction over time, it didn't START OUT as one. The same result could easily have been achieved by other means that were less confusing. We're only talking about a very few specific situations. I mean really, there are HOW MANY opportunity action powers which attack that aren't Opportunity Attacks? Seriously, this would have been trivial to write in a clearer and more straightforward way.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>What I'm saying is it is an obtuse enough rule that even people who ARE experienced with RPGs and game systems CAN be confused by it. They are neither idiots nor lazy, they are simply ordinary 4e players, like you find at most tables. They have books, they have undoubtedly read them. They obviously didn't go over every bit of the rules with a fine toothed comb. That IS what it takes to unravel stuff like this. You can call my players lazy bums all you want, but that doesn't make it true. Now YOU may be playing with nothing but rules hounds that spend loads of time but you may want to unbend and learn to appreciate that this is not the usual situation.</p><p></p><p>These people play 4e once a week for 4-5 hours. They don't DM, they also play plenty of other games, and generally speaking they have a reasonable grasp of the rules. THIS particular rule tends to trip up pretty much everyone in that category. It IS a problem rule.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>NO IT ISN'T!!!!!!!!! I have the actual observational evidence to prove it! You have theorycrafting and a hypothesis. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Right, except the names for the two things are nearly identical and easy to confuse. The game uses plenty of 'terminology' so loosely in other places that such distinctions can easily seem meaningless. It is (and again I am citing evidence not opinion) OBVIOUSLY not that clear. An Opportunity Action which results in an MBA and an Opportunity Attack which results in an MBA, hmmmm, those aren't similar at all! ROFLMAO! It is hard to even take any attempt to call them easily distinguished seriously. Worse than this there is really no significant in-game reason for the two situations to call for different modifiers. They cover essentially exactly the same type of situation and the only distinction is how the ability to use them is granted, not what they do. Meaningless distinctions are NOT good RPG design.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5376080, member: 82106"] No, actually I can't see why it is this way at all DS. It has BECOME codified as a meaningful distinction over time, it didn't START OUT as one. The same result could easily have been achieved by other means that were less confusing. We're only talking about a very few specific situations. I mean really, there are HOW MANY opportunity action powers which attack that aren't Opportunity Attacks? Seriously, this would have been trivial to write in a clearer and more straightforward way. What I'm saying is it is an obtuse enough rule that even people who ARE experienced with RPGs and game systems CAN be confused by it. They are neither idiots nor lazy, they are simply ordinary 4e players, like you find at most tables. They have books, they have undoubtedly read them. They obviously didn't go over every bit of the rules with a fine toothed comb. That IS what it takes to unravel stuff like this. You can call my players lazy bums all you want, but that doesn't make it true. Now YOU may be playing with nothing but rules hounds that spend loads of time but you may want to unbend and learn to appreciate that this is not the usual situation. These people play 4e once a week for 4-5 hours. They don't DM, they also play plenty of other games, and generally speaking they have a reasonable grasp of the rules. THIS particular rule tends to trip up pretty much everyone in that category. It IS a problem rule. NO IT ISN'T!!!!!!!!! I have the actual observational evidence to prove it! You have theorycrafting and a hypothesis. Right, except the names for the two things are nearly identical and easy to confuse. The game uses plenty of 'terminology' so loosely in other places that such distinctions can easily seem meaningless. It is (and again I am citing evidence not opinion) OBVIOUSLY not that clear. An Opportunity Action which results in an MBA and an Opportunity Attack which results in an MBA, hmmmm, those aren't similar at all! ROFLMAO! It is hard to even take any attempt to call them easily distinguished seriously. Worse than this there is really no significant in-game reason for the two situations to call for different modifiers. They cover essentially exactly the same type of situation and the only distinction is how the ability to use them is granted, not what they do. Meaningless distinctions are NOT good RPG design. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does Opportunity Action + MBA = Opportunity Attack?
Top