Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does Polymorph restrict size-changes?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thanee" data-source="post: 2242598" data-attributes="member: 478"><p>Of course not. Likewise it is not impossible to have both a 5 HD and a 15 HD limit in place at the same time. Both, however, makes no sense in context, of course. And it makes no sense in particular to rule one that way and the other the opposite way. Therefore the only reasonable way to look at it is, that all three restrictions are overruled.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Where did you get that from, that I would not do this?</p><p>In fact, I'm extremely confident, that my arguments are very well thought through. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, it would be, if we would follow your logic, but the guidelines clearly say, that it is not in place. Therefore you must be wrong. And this also applies to <em>Polymorph</em>. Simple logic.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, this might be possible, of course, but it's not very reasonable to assume, given how the clarifications for <em>Polymorph</em> turned out (see WotC website; you know, the guys that made this game <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />). It's OTOH extremely reasonable to assume, that the table is exactly right and is therefore not in need of errata, which in turn is the reason, that there is still no errata for it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, why should they? Looks all perfectly fine.</p><p></p><p>There are only contradictions, if you don't read the spell descriptions right. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There is still a 15 HD limit in place, thanks to <em>Polymorph</em>, please note the fine difference between the parts where the exceptions are outlined.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, I never said that. <em>Polymorph Any Object</em> does not say anything about different forms, only <em>Polymorph</em> does. It does not lift the restrictions on size and type and HD placed by <em>Polymorph</em> therefore (in the way <em>Polymorph</em> does related to <em>Alter Self</em>, because it allows completely different forms). The first only adds objects into the mix and alters the duration and how mental stats are figured in.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Probably, yes. He would surely have saved everyone some trouble by simply using the same language in <em>Polymorph</em> as well, except for this cryptic stuff. But it's obviousenough after some research, that both have the same size limits. </p><p></p><p>Bye</p><p>Thanee</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thanee, post: 2242598, member: 478"] Of course not. Likewise it is not impossible to have both a 5 HD and a 15 HD limit in place at the same time. Both, however, makes no sense in context, of course. And it makes no sense in particular to rule one that way and the other the opposite way. Therefore the only reasonable way to look at it is, that all three restrictions are overruled. Where did you get that from, that I would not do this? In fact, I'm extremely confident, that my arguments are very well thought through. :D No, it would be, if we would follow your logic, but the guidelines clearly say, that it is not in place. Therefore you must be wrong. And this also applies to [i]Polymorph[/i]. Simple logic. Well, this might be possible, of course, but it's not very reasonable to assume, given how the clarifications for [i]Polymorph[/i] turned out (see WotC website; you know, the guys that made this game ;)). It's OTOH extremely reasonable to assume, that the table is exactly right and is therefore not in need of errata, which in turn is the reason, that there is still no errata for it. No, why should they? Looks all perfectly fine. There are only contradictions, if you don't read the spell descriptions right. ;) There is still a 15 HD limit in place, thanks to [i]Polymorph[/i], please note the fine difference between the parts where the exceptions are outlined. No, I never said that. [i]Polymorph Any Object[/i] does not say anything about different forms, only [i]Polymorph[/i] does. It does not lift the restrictions on size and type and HD placed by [i]Polymorph[/i] therefore (in the way [i]Polymorph[/i] does related to [i]Alter Self[/i], because it allows completely different forms). The first only adds objects into the mix and alters the duration and how mental stats are figured in. Probably, yes. He would surely have saved everyone some trouble by simply using the same language in [i]Polymorph[/i] as well, except for this cryptic stuff. But it's obviousenough after some research, that both have the same size limits. Bye Thanee [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does Polymorph restrict size-changes?
Top