Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Thank Dog" data-source="post: 6393919" data-attributes="member: 6780250">I probably did the discussion a disservice by saying that the rules are vague. I don't think they're vague so much as open to multiple interpretations. That doesn't really require adjustment or tweaking, it just requires a common understanding.The funny thing is that part of the reason why I started this thread was that most rules that are contentious and being discussed widely, I find quite clear and obvious as to their RAW and RAI and am constantly surprised that people don't see the rules as obvious as I think they are. During discussions I can see why people are interpreting things the way they do, I merely think they're interpreting them either favourably (for themselves) or misinterpreting, or simply missing some aspects of an interpretation. The fact that I can come away with an interpretation that I think is entirely RAW & RAI, whilst other people can do the same but with different interpretations made me think that maybe this was intentional on the designers part, in order to allow multiple interpretations so as to cater to a wider array of gaming styles which, after all, was one of the design intents of this edition.</blockquote>