Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does the Artificer Suck?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Asisreo" data-source="post: 8175799" data-attributes="member: 7019027"><p>Sorry, I was unclear. What I meant was that the specific text between the Basic Rules and the DMG are identical in reference to spell scroll casting times. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, what happened is they first changed the rules that ALL spells required an action. This means that a scroll (in general) can now require a bonus action or reaction in future adventures/books without having contradictions (though it was always specific beats general anyways). </p><p></p><p>Next, they changed Spell Scrolls in particular. They used to require an action regardless of the spell, and then it would work. Now, it takes the spell's normal casting time. This can be seen as both a benefit and a drawback for certain spells. For example, a spell scroll of Misty Step can still only need a bonus action rather than a whole action, but a spell scroll of Find Familiar will still need a whole hour in order to cast rather than through just an action. </p><p></p><p>Of course, the main draw of spell scrolls will always be their ability to not require any components (a silent casting) while not needing to be known/prepared and no material components or spell slots required or expended.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Asisreo, post: 8175799, member: 7019027"] Sorry, I was unclear. What I meant was that the specific text between the Basic Rules and the DMG are identical in reference to spell scroll casting times. Well, what happened is they first changed the rules that ALL spells required an action. This means that a scroll (in general) can now require a bonus action or reaction in future adventures/books without having contradictions (though it was always specific beats general anyways). Next, they changed Spell Scrolls in particular. They used to require an action regardless of the spell, and then it would work. Now, it takes the spell's normal casting time. This can be seen as both a benefit and a drawback for certain spells. For example, a spell scroll of Misty Step can still only need a bonus action rather than a whole action, but a spell scroll of Find Familiar will still need a whole hour in order to cast rather than through just an action. Of course, the main draw of spell scrolls will always be their ability to not require any components (a silent casting) while not needing to be known/prepared and no material components or spell slots required or expended. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does the Artificer Suck?
Top