Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does the Artificer Suck?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stoutstien" data-source="post: 8176063" data-attributes="member: 7020569"><p>Let's start with the SSI and components. The feature is unique in that it is not spell casting on any level. So not only does the feature excluded any mention of components past the SSI itself, it goes as far to double back on wording to emphasize it's not a spell. no spell casting means no components. Action to activate and the spell's effects happen.</p><p></p><p>As far as concentration and tiny servants are concerned there is no intelligence or stat requirements whatsoever to remain concentration on an effect. See familiar with a ring of spell storing.</p><p>The SSI say the creature who actives the item maintains concentration. full stop. no side bars with exceptions or intelligence checks to see if they are a smart enough. that's about it clearly defined as you're going to get. The tiny servants are creatures and they can take the action to activate the SSI.</p><p></p><p>How bout the tiny servant spell? Nope nothing there. If anything the text gives the artificer a flat out direct rule for commanding the TS to use the SSI.</p><p></p><p>So if a DM is shifting concentration from one creature to another they are actively making a ruling that is contrary to every written rule. Not a bad thing but it is the very definition of both a house rule and a direct nerf to a class feature. There is absolutely no support for this ruling past rule zero.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stoutstien, post: 8176063, member: 7020569"] Let's start with the SSI and components. The feature is unique in that it is not spell casting on any level. So not only does the feature excluded any mention of components past the SSI itself, it goes as far to double back on wording to emphasize it's not a spell. no spell casting means no components. Action to activate and the spell's effects happen. As far as concentration and tiny servants are concerned there is no intelligence or stat requirements whatsoever to remain concentration on an effect. See familiar with a ring of spell storing. The SSI say the creature who actives the item maintains concentration. full stop. no side bars with exceptions or intelligence checks to see if they are a smart enough. that's about it clearly defined as you're going to get. The tiny servants are creatures and they can take the action to activate the SSI. How bout the tiny servant spell? Nope nothing there. If anything the text gives the artificer a flat out direct rule for commanding the TS to use the SSI. So if a DM is shifting concentration from one creature to another they are actively making a ruling that is contrary to every written rule. Not a bad thing but it is the very definition of both a house rule and a direct nerf to a class feature. There is absolutely no support for this ruling past rule zero. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does the Artificer Suck?
Top