Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does the Artificer Suck?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blue" data-source="post: 8176661" data-attributes="member: 20564"><p>Just to make sure. You are saying that when you run, you make players aware that you use the rules written in a particular printing of the DMG, and/or list the rules that have changed that you don't agree with?</p><p></p><p>Because otherwise you're hiding it. A player may know the actual official rule from their own books or from another table, and if you are playing with non-official rules and don't let them know, it's hiding it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You don't have to pay for a new one, they have handy errata documents.</p><p></p><p>And if you don't like it, house rule it. Already said I'm for it. Second guessing that it didn't need to be changed isn't contributing to anything since obviously the people who decided what rules are official disagree.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And your examples assume that players have infinite reactions and infinite scrolls of reaction spells in order to be able to "Rinse and repeat for every possible caster". It also assumes every lich and caster out there is ignorant of basic ways to get around counterspell. Be more than 60' away, mode to hidden, ready to release when you see your opponent (which casts) then move back into view, be the second spell cast - either legendary actions or have allies, etc.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Citation needed. Obviously the easiest for the designers would have been no change, so there was an impetious to change it. That it was broken in it's original form according to them. Your claims that it was not thought out and definitely not playtested is throwing share without any proof. And since it's an official rule that most tables have in play and we DON'T hear about "powergamers destroying campaigns" with it, we can assume that you are just making up unsupport facts again like the rest of this paragraph.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blue, post: 8176661, member: 20564"] Just to make sure. You are saying that when you run, you make players aware that you use the rules written in a particular printing of the DMG, and/or list the rules that have changed that you don't agree with? Because otherwise you're hiding it. A player may know the actual official rule from their own books or from another table, and if you are playing with non-official rules and don't let them know, it's hiding it. You don't have to pay for a new one, they have handy errata documents. And if you don't like it, house rule it. Already said I'm for it. Second guessing that it didn't need to be changed isn't contributing to anything since obviously the people who decided what rules are official disagree. And your examples assume that players have infinite reactions and infinite scrolls of reaction spells in order to be able to "Rinse and repeat for every possible caster". It also assumes every lich and caster out there is ignorant of basic ways to get around counterspell. Be more than 60' away, mode to hidden, ready to release when you see your opponent (which casts) then move back into view, be the second spell cast - either legendary actions or have allies, etc. Citation needed. Obviously the easiest for the designers would have been no change, so there was an impetious to change it. That it was broken in it's original form according to them. Your claims that it was not thought out and definitely not playtested is throwing share without any proof. And since it's an official rule that most tables have in play and we DON'T hear about "powergamers destroying campaigns" with it, we can assume that you are just making up unsupport facts again like the rest of this paragraph. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does the Artificer Suck?
Top