Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pming" data-source="post: 6829990" data-attributes="member: 45197">Hiya!No, it isn't philosophical...but it is, as I said, far to vague a question it may as well be. As I also said in the last part of my last post, "No...doesn't suck...[my reasons]...". I did "guess" at what 'sucks' means to you...but, as we can clearly see, your "sucks" is quite a bit different from my "sucks". Your "sucks" seems to be oriented towards what class abilities, bonuses and spells an EK can bring into combat as compared to, say a F/MU, Paladin, or some particular flavour of Cleric. I think that version of 'sucks' isn't nearly as important as all the other stuff...like, is it fun to play, does it give a good vibe for the group's campaign setting, and how varied can a EK's personality/background/etc be.Because of what your version of 'sucks' seems to be implying (based on this and other threads of yours), I suggested (perhaps a bit harshly, sorry about that), that you perhaps rephrase future topics with a more narrowly defined definition (e.g., "With regards to combat DPS and combat variety, how does an Eldritch Knight compare to other fighting/magic-using classes?").^_^Paul L. Ming</blockquote>