Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does the new ammunition rule screw up dual hand crossbow?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 6640464" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>Because they wanted to clarify their intentions on how they originally thought it supposed to work... knowing full well that anyone who didn't like it could just <em>ignore the errata and play it however they wanted to</em>.</p><p></p><p>People dual-wielding hand crossbows with no manner or method to reload them were thumbing <em>their</em> eye at human anatomy and physics... so they really can't get too upset when the designers decided to "thumb their eye" right back. Especially when those players could just use the Rule of Cool and keep doing what they were doing anyway.</p><p></p><p>When it comes down to ALL of these rules in the game... WotC defaults to what appears to be the most common or most popular method amongst the playerbase. That's how they designed most things in the game. Which mean yes... occasionally the outliers like the dual-wielding crossbowists, will be shown to be outliers by having the loopholes they were climbing through occasionally sewn up to go along with how most of the playerbase is already playing the game. Thus it now comes down to those outliers to make the choice to just ignore the errata for their game. Which is completely fine if they choose to do so. Nobody else is going to care.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 6640464, member: 7006"] Because they wanted to clarify their intentions on how they originally thought it supposed to work... knowing full well that anyone who didn't like it could just [i]ignore the errata and play it however they wanted to[/i]. People dual-wielding hand crossbows with no manner or method to reload them were thumbing [i]their[/i] eye at human anatomy and physics... so they really can't get too upset when the designers decided to "thumb their eye" right back. Especially when those players could just use the Rule of Cool and keep doing what they were doing anyway. When it comes down to ALL of these rules in the game... WotC defaults to what appears to be the most common or most popular method amongst the playerbase. That's how they designed most things in the game. Which mean yes... occasionally the outliers like the dual-wielding crossbowists, will be shown to be outliers by having the loopholes they were climbing through occasionally sewn up to go along with how most of the playerbase is already playing the game. Thus it now comes down to those outliers to make the choice to just ignore the errata for their game. Which is completely fine if they choose to do so. Nobody else is going to care. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does the new ammunition rule screw up dual hand crossbow?
Top