Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does the Rabiah Scale matter (for conversion probability from Magic plane to D&D setting)?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercurius" data-source="post: 8252250" data-attributes="member: 59082"><p>A few years ago, Magic: the Gathering designer Mark Rosewater created the <a href="https://mtg.fandom.com/wiki/Rabiah_Scale" target="_blank">Rabiah Scale</a>, which ranks Magic planes by likelihood to receive future sets of cards, from 1 (very likely) to 10 (very unlikely). With recent talk about Magic planes as settings, and whether or not WotC will increase the publication of Magic settings to one a year, I thought I'd revisit the question of the Rabiah Scale, and whether or not it has any bearing on which planes they choose to convert to D&D.</p><p></p><p>The latest rankings are:</p><p></p><p>1: <em>Dominaria, Innistrad,</em> <strong>Ravnica (2018)</strong></p><p>2: <em>Zendikar</em></p><p>3: <strong>Theros (2020)</strong></p><p>4: Kaldheim</p><p>5: Alara, <em>Amonkhet</em>, Eldraine, Ikoria, New Phyrexia, Tarkir</p><p>6: <em>Ixalan, Kaladesh,</em> Regatha, Vryn</p><p>7: Fiora, Kamigawa, Kylem, Lorwyn-Shadowmoor, Shandalar</p><p>8: Muraganda, Segovia</p><p>9: Gobakhan, Mercadia, Phyrexia, Rath, Serra's Realm, Ulgrotha</p><p>10: Balblovia, Portal Three Kingdoms, Rabiah, Tolvada</p><p></p><p>Those in italics have received a Plane Shift article, while those in bold have already been published as settings.</p><p></p><p>Now obviously this is all speculative, but one would think that the Rabiah Scale has <em>some </em>bearing on the likelihood of conversion, if only because it implies future attention from WotC, and thus more exposure. And of course the two published so far are two of the five highest ranked, which implies that the Rabiah Scale means <em>something.</em></p><p></p><p>My guess is that the next setting or two will be chosen from the 1-5 ratings, and that we can pretty much cross out any of the 8-10s. I know some have claimed that coverage as a Plane Shift makes it less likely, but I'm not so sure.</p><p></p><p>Meaning:</p><p><strong>1-5: Strongest candidates </strong>- Dominaria, Innistrad, Zendikar, Kaldheim, Alara, Amonkhet, Eldraine, Ikoria, New Phyrexia, Tarkir.</p><p><strong>6-7: Unlikely, but possible</strong> - Ixalan, Kaladesh, Regatha, Vryn, Fiora, Kamigawa, Kylem, Lorwyn-Shadowmoor, Shandalar.</p><p><strong>8-10: Very unlikely</strong> - Muraganda, Segovia, Gobakhan, Mercadia, Phyrexia, Rath, Serra's Realm, Ulgrotha, Balblovia, Portal Three Kingdoms, Rabiah, Tolvada.</p><p></p><p>Within those categories, I suppose you could make little adjustments based upon other factors - whether it explores new territory, whether something similar has already been published (e.g. Innistrad and Ravenloft), how hard it would be to convert to the D&D rule set, etc. </p><p></p><p>In that first category, you could categorize them in a few groups:</p><p><em>Strongly influenced by real-world analogues:</em> Kaldheim, Amonkhet, Eldraine, Tarkir</p><p><em>Unique/gonzo/quite different from D&D</em>: Zendikar, Alara, Ikoria, New Phyrexia</p><p><em>Similar to already-existing D&D settings:</em> Dominaria (because it is the most "vanilla"), Innistrad (Ravenloft)</p><p></p><p>The other groups can be similarly assigned (e.g. Ixalan, Kaladesh, and Kamigawa in the analogue group).</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure if this brings anything new to the table, but maybe it analyzes the planes in a way that at least we think in terms of those planes that are more or less likely to receive conversion. </p><p></p><p>Thoughts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercurius, post: 8252250, member: 59082"] A few years ago, Magic: the Gathering designer Mark Rosewater created the [URL='https://mtg.fandom.com/wiki/Rabiah_Scale']Rabiah Scale[/URL], which ranks Magic planes by likelihood to receive future sets of cards, from 1 (very likely) to 10 (very unlikely). With recent talk about Magic planes as settings, and whether or not WotC will increase the publication of Magic settings to one a year, I thought I'd revisit the question of the Rabiah Scale, and whether or not it has any bearing on which planes they choose to convert to D&D. The latest rankings are: 1: [I]Dominaria, Innistrad,[/I] [B]Ravnica (2018)[/B] 2: [I]Zendikar[/I] 3: [B]Theros (2020)[/B] 4: Kaldheim 5: Alara, [I]Amonkhet[/I], Eldraine, Ikoria, New Phyrexia, Tarkir 6: [I]Ixalan, Kaladesh,[/I] Regatha, Vryn 7: Fiora, Kamigawa, Kylem, Lorwyn-Shadowmoor, Shandalar 8: Muraganda, Segovia 9: Gobakhan, Mercadia, Phyrexia, Rath, Serra's Realm, Ulgrotha 10: Balblovia, Portal Three Kingdoms, Rabiah, Tolvada Those in italics have received a Plane Shift article, while those in bold have already been published as settings. Now obviously this is all speculative, but one would think that the Rabiah Scale has [I]some [/I]bearing on the likelihood of conversion, if only because it implies future attention from WotC, and thus more exposure. And of course the two published so far are two of the five highest ranked, which implies that the Rabiah Scale means [I]something.[/I] My guess is that the next setting or two will be chosen from the 1-5 ratings, and that we can pretty much cross out any of the 8-10s. I know some have claimed that coverage as a Plane Shift makes it less likely, but I'm not so sure. Meaning: [B]1-5: Strongest candidates [/B]- Dominaria, Innistrad, Zendikar, Kaldheim, Alara, Amonkhet, Eldraine, Ikoria, New Phyrexia, Tarkir. [B]6-7: Unlikely, but possible[/B] - Ixalan, Kaladesh, Regatha, Vryn, Fiora, Kamigawa, Kylem, Lorwyn-Shadowmoor, Shandalar. [B]8-10: Very unlikely[/B] - Muraganda, Segovia, Gobakhan, Mercadia, Phyrexia, Rath, Serra's Realm, Ulgrotha, Balblovia, Portal Three Kingdoms, Rabiah, Tolvada. Within those categories, I suppose you could make little adjustments based upon other factors - whether it explores new territory, whether something similar has already been published (e.g. Innistrad and Ravenloft), how hard it would be to convert to the D&D rule set, etc. In that first category, you could categorize them in a few groups: [I]Strongly influenced by real-world analogues:[/I] Kaldheim, Amonkhet, Eldraine, Tarkir [I]Unique/gonzo/quite different from D&D[/I]: Zendikar, Alara, Ikoria, New Phyrexia [I]Similar to already-existing D&D settings:[/I] Dominaria (because it is the most "vanilla"), Innistrad (Ravenloft) The other groups can be similarly assigned (e.g. Ixalan, Kaladesh, and Kamigawa in the analogue group). I'm not sure if this brings anything new to the table, but maybe it analyzes the planes in a way that at least we think in terms of those planes that are more or less likely to receive conversion. Thoughts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does the Rabiah Scale matter (for conversion probability from Magic plane to D&D setting)?
Top