Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does the term "a creature" include yourself?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arlough" data-source="post: 5447736" data-attributes="member: 79335"><p>As for targeting, well the discussion here bled out into my table when I asked what people thought of the idea. Then there was much discussion and agreement that this is something that really should be clarified, because we all had different views on what the rule was. I, as the DM, ruled that a creature can target itself if the power does not have restrictive stipulations that prevent it (for example, a power that can only attack dazed creatures when the creature itself isn't dazed) Well, here is what WotC Customer support responded with when I asked for guidance on Forceful Push, and more generally, the targeting of yourself.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And the response...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Now, I have not adopted essentials so I can't verify this. Can anyone else confirm this, please?</p><p></p><p>Also, this seems like it completely neuters things that dominate, as well as some buffing abilities. It also takes a lot of the risk out of spells like fireball, which I disagree with. If I only played Strikers and Defenders, this wouldn't bother me so much. But when I do get to play, I tend to play Controllers and Leaders instead, and I think this would weaken the cinematic options available to me.</p><p>I can't confirm that right now, because I don't have any of my books with me, and I let my DDi subscription die ungracefully quite a while ago.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arlough, post: 5447736, member: 79335"] As for targeting, well the discussion here bled out into my table when I asked what people thought of the idea. Then there was much discussion and agreement that this is something that really should be clarified, because we all had different views on what the rule was. I, as the DM, ruled that a creature can target itself if the power does not have restrictive stipulations that prevent it (for example, a power that can only attack dazed creatures when the creature itself isn't dazed) Well, here is what WotC Customer support responded with when I asked for guidance on Forceful Push, and more generally, the targeting of yourself. And the response... Now, I have not adopted essentials so I can't verify this. Can anyone else confirm this, please? Also, this seems like it completely neuters things that dominate, as well as some buffing abilities. It also takes a lot of the risk out of spells like fireball, which I disagree with. If I only played Strikers and Defenders, this wouldn't bother me so much. But when I do get to play, I tend to play Controllers and Leaders instead, and I think this would weaken the cinematic options available to me. I can't confirm that right now, because I don't have any of my books with me, and I let my DDi subscription die ungracefully quite a while ago. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does the term "a creature" include yourself?
Top