Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Does the TV scifi paradigm need to change?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rackhir" data-source="post: 1301254" data-attributes="member: 149"><p>I would agree that costs are probably the main thing that is killing SF on TV. One of the main thrusts behind the "Reality" TV shows, is that you don't have to pay writers to do one or "name" actors. If the networks are so cheap that they don't even want to pay writers, something that requires expensive sfx really doesn't stand much of a chance. </p><p></p><p>Especially given the short term narrow mindedness that is rampant in hollywood and TV. Pretty much nothing is given a chance to grow and develop an audience these days and SF because of it's niche status is never going to attract big numbers right off the bat, barring some big name franchise being involved.</p><p></p><p>Also and perhaps I'm just getting older, very little seems to be done on TV especially in "SF" shows that shows much in the way of sentience. Most of what's been on TV has been the kind of junk like Mutant X or Beastmaster that seems to be aimed at pre/early teens. The market is headed steadily down hill interms of the average intelligence it's aimed at. If the presence of shows like "Beyond with John Edwards" (forget the actual title) or the increasingly sleezy and tawdry "reality" shows leave anyone with questions about that?</p><p></p><p>Finally, Fear Rules Hollywood and the Networks - The people in charge in the entertainment industry are those who have spent a lifetime working to get into a position of power with all the attendant perks and privileges, while watching rivals and friends loosing jobs at the drop of a hat or a single mistake. They are facing a shrinking fragmenting market, because of the vastly expanded market of cable channels and rise of other entertainment mediums (internet, video games, etc...), which means that the pressure is increased even more. They will do anything and listen to anything that seems to offer some measure of control and certainty over their future, while avoiding as much risk as is at all possible. Which is why there are 18 different shows based on Law & Order, CSI and 2000 shows which are variations on what was sucessful last season. Despite the success of SF at theaters, it is always going to be viewed as a niche market (especially on TV) and the people who are in charge of the networks don't understand it, aren't interested in it and don't want propose anything that puts them at risk.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rackhir, post: 1301254, member: 149"] I would agree that costs are probably the main thing that is killing SF on TV. One of the main thrusts behind the "Reality" TV shows, is that you don't have to pay writers to do one or "name" actors. If the networks are so cheap that they don't even want to pay writers, something that requires expensive sfx really doesn't stand much of a chance. Especially given the short term narrow mindedness that is rampant in hollywood and TV. Pretty much nothing is given a chance to grow and develop an audience these days and SF because of it's niche status is never going to attract big numbers right off the bat, barring some big name franchise being involved. Also and perhaps I'm just getting older, very little seems to be done on TV especially in "SF" shows that shows much in the way of sentience. Most of what's been on TV has been the kind of junk like Mutant X or Beastmaster that seems to be aimed at pre/early teens. The market is headed steadily down hill interms of the average intelligence it's aimed at. If the presence of shows like "Beyond with John Edwards" (forget the actual title) or the increasingly sleezy and tawdry "reality" shows leave anyone with questions about that? Finally, Fear Rules Hollywood and the Networks - The people in charge in the entertainment industry are those who have spent a lifetime working to get into a position of power with all the attendant perks and privileges, while watching rivals and friends loosing jobs at the drop of a hat or a single mistake. They are facing a shrinking fragmenting market, because of the vastly expanded market of cable channels and rise of other entertainment mediums (internet, video games, etc...), which means that the pressure is increased even more. They will do anything and listen to anything that seems to offer some measure of control and certainty over their future, while avoiding as much risk as is at all possible. Which is why there are 18 different shows based on Law & Order, CSI and 2000 shows which are variations on what was sucessful last season. Despite the success of SF at theaters, it is always going to be viewed as a niche market (especially on TV) and the people who are in charge of the networks don't understand it, aren't interested in it and don't want propose anything that puts them at risk. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Does the TV scifi paradigm need to change?
Top