Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Does the TV scifi paradigm need to change?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 1303540" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>If you don't assume the audience has seen A, when you refer to it you must retell the entire story of A, comic-book style, the way they tell you every other issue how Peter Parker was bitten by a radioactive spider, and his Uncle ben said "With great power comes great responsibility".</p><p></p><p>If you make only partial reference, say by having a plot point relate to A, but you don't explicitly say it, and instead expect the audience to remember it, any viewer who didn't see the previous episodes gets lost. </p><p></p><p>You wanna see what happens when you try to write a show that doesn't assume you've seen previous episodes? Look at "Gene Roddenberry's Andromeda". Started out with some of the greatest character development, some of the most interesting plots you've ever sunk your teeth into. But some folks felt that long, involved sotryline depended too much on the audience having seen previous episodes. And honestly, it did. They simpley didn't have time to explicate all that had gone on before each time it became relevant, since there was a lot going on. If you didn't watch regularly, you got lost. It was felt that made the show "inaccessible to new and part-time viewers", and that would severely limit the show's growth and longevity. So, all that plot and development was scrapped, and the show turned to mush. </p><p></p><p>Mind you, last time I checked (which IIRC was back at the beginning of this season), Andromeda was still the #1 syndicated genre show, still making money.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 1303540, member: 177"] If you don't assume the audience has seen A, when you refer to it you must retell the entire story of A, comic-book style, the way they tell you every other issue how Peter Parker was bitten by a radioactive spider, and his Uncle ben said "With great power comes great responsibility". If you make only partial reference, say by having a plot point relate to A, but you don't explicitly say it, and instead expect the audience to remember it, any viewer who didn't see the previous episodes gets lost. You wanna see what happens when you try to write a show that doesn't assume you've seen previous episodes? Look at "Gene Roddenberry's Andromeda". Started out with some of the greatest character development, some of the most interesting plots you've ever sunk your teeth into. But some folks felt that long, involved sotryline depended too much on the audience having seen previous episodes. And honestly, it did. They simpley didn't have time to explicate all that had gone on before each time it became relevant, since there was a lot going on. If you didn't watch regularly, you got lost. It was felt that made the show "inaccessible to new and part-time viewers", and that would severely limit the show's growth and longevity. So, all that plot and development was scrapped, and the show turned to mush. Mind you, last time I checked (which IIRC was back at the beginning of this season), Andromeda was still the #1 syndicated genre show, still making money. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Does the TV scifi paradigm need to change?
Top