Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Gradine" data-source="post: 7083369" data-attributes="member: 57112">Wow, this only took one post to derail into "caster supremacy wotc hates martials!" That has to be a record, if only because it's not possible to do it any more quickly.That said, if there was a thread that was going to do that... Far be it from me to speculate on the intentions of the OP...Seriously, wizards are fine. They're just fine. If anything, spells learned per level should probably be adjusted on the basis of how forthcoming the DM is with scrolls and other spellcaster's books to copy from. If the DM doesn't bother with any of that at all then yeah, maybe 3/level might be appropriate.That's kind of the problem with white-room "wizard supremacy"; people forget that aside from those 2/level spells a wizard's spellbook is basically at the mercy of the DM; it's not like 3.X where a wizard could reasonably be assured to be able to purchase any damn spell they want. Of course, that 2/level is still better than the Sorcerer (and 5th gives them a much better spell list on top of that), which is the closest comparison class if balance is at all your goal.</blockquote>