Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does the wizard need more spells learned per level?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7084406" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>Caster supremacy is hardly off-topic when the topic is making a full caster class even more versatile. And it does go all the way back to the earliest days of the game, heck, when you hear anecdotes from the playtesting of the original D&D, it seems like everyone was playing magic-users. </p><p></p><p>Which is why, the second half of that is kinda silly. "WotC hates martials?" Really? Let's look at the TSR vs WotC track record:</p><p></p><p>TSR, from 1974 through 1997, came up with what for martial (which in the TSR years, was prettymuch just the fighter) classes? </p><p>Weapon Specialization. </p><p>Two decades, that was the best they could do. </p><p>TSR went from just the magic user, to the magic-user & illusionist, to the Mage and 8 different specialist who all got 9th level spells, and from the Cleric, to the Cleric & Druid, to myriad different specialty priests who all got 9th level spells.</p><p></p><p>WotC, OTOH, from 2000-present:</p><p>Invented Feats and lavished them on the 3.0 fighter. OK, that didn't help the fighter emerge from Tier 5, but it was still /something/. </p><p>Added new 'martial classes,' like the Knight and Warblade, and finally, in 4e, the Warlord.</p><p>Speaking of 4e, it actually came the closest D&D ever did to <strong>balancing martial & caster classes</strong>. If there was a period where Caster Supremacy was least plausible, it had to be between the release of the 4e PH1 and Essentials. OK, it was only about 2 years, but it <strong>was on WotC's watch.</strong></p><p></p><p> I don't think that's a big issue, 2 spells known/level is plenty, it's the most the wizard has ever gotten automatically (heck, in the early days, you just got a few starting spells and were on your own from then on). And, while the Cleric & Druid, the other two 'prep'-based neo-Vancian casters, have complete access to their smaller lists, the remaining full casters have far fewer known spells.</p><p></p><p>The Sorcerer, for instance......wishes he had it so good.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 7084406, member: 996"] Caster supremacy is hardly off-topic when the topic is making a full caster class even more versatile. And it does go all the way back to the earliest days of the game, heck, when you hear anecdotes from the playtesting of the original D&D, it seems like everyone was playing magic-users. Which is why, the second half of that is kinda silly. "WotC hates martials?" Really? Let's look at the TSR vs WotC track record: TSR, from 1974 through 1997, came up with what for martial (which in the TSR years, was prettymuch just the fighter) classes? Weapon Specialization. Two decades, that was the best they could do. TSR went from just the magic user, to the magic-user & illusionist, to the Mage and 8 different specialist who all got 9th level spells, and from the Cleric, to the Cleric & Druid, to myriad different specialty priests who all got 9th level spells. WotC, OTOH, from 2000-present: Invented Feats and lavished them on the 3.0 fighter. OK, that didn't help the fighter emerge from Tier 5, but it was still /something/. Added new 'martial classes,' like the Knight and Warblade, and finally, in 4e, the Warlord. Speaking of 4e, it actually came the closest D&D ever did to [b]balancing martial & caster classes[/b]. If there was a period where Caster Supremacy was least plausible, it had to be between the release of the 4e PH1 and Essentials. OK, it was only about 2 years, but it [b]was on WotC's watch.[/b] I don't think that's a big issue, 2 spells known/level is plenty, it's the most the wizard has ever gotten automatically (heck, in the early days, you just got a few starting spells and were on your own from then on). And, while the Cleric & Druid, the other two 'prep'-based neo-Vancian casters, have complete access to their smaller lists, the remaining full casters have far fewer known spells. The Sorcerer, for instance......wishes he had it so good. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does the wizard need more spells learned per level?
Top