Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does this seem to be the edition that was made for splatbooks?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Grainger" data-source="post: 6397984" data-attributes="member: 6779234"><p>Not just that, but the DM should be in control of what rules apply in his/her campaign. It's awkward when it becomes the default presumption that players can import who rule-sets, and it puts huge extra workload on the DM (they have to keep up with each and every new book, whereas with campaign-centred books they don't need to read them if they're not interested in that play style or world background).</p><p></p><p>Sure, the DM can always say "no", but this creates a very awkward situation**. A player excitedly rushes in with a new book, saying "I can't wait to do this!" and the DM says "not in my game you're not". To which the player thinks "waah - you swine - I just spend £30 on this!". When actually, this wouldn't have happened if the hateful book hadn't been released in the first place.</p><p></p><p>Thankfully, the first "splat" release does exactly that, by keeping it specific to a campaign. I won't be running the campaign, so I don't even have to think about the damn thing, let alone read it, care what's in it, or have to rule on whether we're using it in my game.</p><p></p><p>And don't get me started on the "you have to buy this to keep your character competitive" aspect of it (I've never liked the damn things ever since TSR explicitly advertised them this way <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/devil.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":devil:" title="Devil :devil:" data-shortname=":devil:" />).<strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>TL;DR: </strong>Let's keep supplementary rules firmly in the province of the DM. If the DM doesn't explicitly go out of their way to choose them, they shouldn't be a player option. By all means release cool new options, but let's frame them as DM books, not things the players feel entitled to bring to the table. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>*that's not to say that the DM shouldn't listen to player tastes, of course</p><p></p><p>**I am English, and avoiding awkward situations must be done, at all costs</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Grainger, post: 6397984, member: 6779234"] Not just that, but the DM should be in control of what rules apply in his/her campaign. It's awkward when it becomes the default presumption that players can import who rule-sets, and it puts huge extra workload on the DM (they have to keep up with each and every new book, whereas with campaign-centred books they don't need to read them if they're not interested in that play style or world background). Sure, the DM can always say "no", but this creates a very awkward situation**. A player excitedly rushes in with a new book, saying "I can't wait to do this!" and the DM says "not in my game you're not". To which the player thinks "waah - you swine - I just spend £30 on this!". When actually, this wouldn't have happened if the hateful book hadn't been released in the first place. Thankfully, the first "splat" release does exactly that, by keeping it specific to a campaign. I won't be running the campaign, so I don't even have to think about the damn thing, let alone read it, care what's in it, or have to rule on whether we're using it in my game. And don't get me started on the "you have to buy this to keep your character competitive" aspect of it (I've never liked the damn things ever since TSR explicitly advertised them this way :devil:).[B] TL;DR: [/B]Let's keep supplementary rules firmly in the province of the DM. If the DM doesn't explicitly go out of their way to choose them, they shouldn't be a player option. By all means release cool new options, but let's frame them as DM books, not things the players feel entitled to bring to the table. *that's not to say that the DM shouldn't listen to player tastes, of course **I am English, and avoiding awkward situations must be done, at all costs [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does this seem to be the edition that was made for splatbooks?
Top