Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does unarmed strike qualify for the Improved Natural Attack feat?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trainz" data-source="post: 2083442" data-attributes="member: 2122"><p>And you just wrote exactly what I wanted to say.</p><p></p><p>Really people, are your monks so overpowered in your games and campaign-crushing that you must make such a sustained effort to try to convince the DMing masses that the feat cannot be taken ? </p><p></p><p>It is quite clear that the rules can be interpreted on both ways of the fence. There's no hard evidence for or against it. Therefore, any decision you take is purely influenced by your desires as a game master. Either you (A) give your monk players a break and let them have a fair shot to be a valuable part of the adventuring party, or (B) you don't, and you end up with the monk class being seldom taken at all in your campaign.</p><p></p><p>I would not like to play under DM (B), for such a trend in rules decision can only end up in my gaming pleasure being diminished.</p><p></p><p>I am quite content to have a DM forbid me from doing something in the rules (I would accept that a DM, for example, forbids my sorceror from using any of the Orb spells from CA. The sorceror class isn't underpowered, and it can be debated that the Orb spells are overpowered), but only if he does so in pursuing a balanced and enjoyable campaign. The monk has been identified again and again by many as a sub-par class, and forbiding him to take that feat is just... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />.</p><p></p><p><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trainz, post: 2083442, member: 2122"] And you just wrote exactly what I wanted to say. Really people, are your monks so overpowered in your games and campaign-crushing that you must make such a sustained effort to try to convince the DMing masses that the feat cannot be taken ? It is quite clear that the rules can be interpreted on both ways of the fence. There's no hard evidence for or against it. Therefore, any decision you take is purely influenced by your desires as a game master. Either you (A) give your monk players a break and let them have a fair shot to be a valuable part of the adventuring party, or (B) you don't, and you end up with the monk class being seldom taken at all in your campaign. I would not like to play under DM (B), for such a trend in rules decision can only end up in my gaming pleasure being diminished. I am quite content to have a DM forbid me from doing something in the rules (I would accept that a DM, for example, forbids my sorceror from using any of the Orb spells from CA. The sorceror class isn't underpowered, and it can be debated that the Orb spells are overpowered), but only if he does so in pursuing a balanced and enjoyable campaign. The monk has been identified again and again by many as a sub-par class, and forbiding him to take that feat is just... :):):):):):):). ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Does unarmed strike qualify for the Improved Natural Attack feat?
Top