Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Goobermunch" data-source="post: 4178496" data-attributes="member: 10516">Actually, you're conflating the two separate provisions.&nbsp; One section, section 5, deals with termination for breach.&nbsp; The other section, section 6 deals with the effect of termination.&nbsp; Section 6 does not limit itself to termination for breach.Now technically, the d20 STL doesn't include language indicating that it is a revocable license.&nbsp; However, &quot;Wizards of the Coast may issue updates and/or revisions to this License without prior notice.&nbsp; You will conform in all respects to the updated or revised terms of this License.&nbsp; Subsequent versions of this License will bear a different version number.&quot;&nbsp; Essentially, this means that Wizards can update the license to clarify that point.&nbsp; The license is then terminable.&nbsp; At which point, the full effect of section 6 comes into effect.In addition, because section 6 does not limit itself only to termination for breach, there's a good argument that WotC intended to retain termination powers without recourse to amendment.I do agree with your comments regarding the better business practices WotC could follow.&nbsp; However, that doesn't make WotC's current actions ultra vires.IAALJNYL--G</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Goobermunch, post: 4178496, member: 10516"] Actually, you're conflating the two separate provisions. One section, section 5, deals with termination for breach. The other section, section 6 deals with the effect of termination. Section 6 does not limit itself to termination for breach. Now technically, the d20 STL doesn't include language indicating that it is a revocable license. However, "Wizards of the Coast may issue updates and/or revisions to this License without prior notice. You will conform in all respects to the updated or revised terms of this License. Subsequent versions of this License will bear a different version number." Essentially, this means that Wizards can update the license to clarify that point. The license is then terminable. At which point, the full effect of section 6 comes into effect. In addition, because section 6 does not limit itself only to termination for breach, there's a good argument that WotC intended to retain termination powers without recourse to amendment. I do agree with your comments regarding the better business practices WotC could follow. However, that doesn't make WotC's current actions ultra vires. IAALJNYL --G [/QUOTE]

Verification