Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does WotC view the Monk class as overtuned from their perspective?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shadowoflameth" data-source="post: 9171188" data-attributes="member: 62336"><p>With a standard array you can potentially have two 16s at 1st. That isn't the problem. The problem is that two abilities that in principal work well (Flurry and Stunning) are tied to a d4. The d4 Martial Arts damage is a non-ability because all the weapons in the game except the blowgun already do better including all of the monk weapons. If you have two 16s You aren't getting a fighting style at 1st as a monk (Fighting initiate; Unarmed Style) and so you do a d4 with your main attack unless you sacrifice something to do better. You quickly run out of Ki Points because both Flurry of Blows and Stunning Strike cost them. Then consider Step of the Wind costing Ki for something that a Skirmisher needs (and the rogue gets unlimited use of) and you have a character that is a less effective unarmed fighter than the fighter with an unarmed build and a less effective skirmisher than the rogue with a skirmisher build. The mediocre chance to stun a foe is not enough effectiveness to compensate for this and you don't get Stunning strike until after spending the 1st 5 levels nothing as effective as your allies in any role no matter how you build. They need to fix the Ki point cost AND the damage with Unarmed Strike, (BTW a d6 doesn't do that because of the feat I mentioned). Give them a fighting style at 1st level, and make FINALLY Monk unarmed Strikes a Martial Melee Weapon, and a Monk Weapon. (Making them eligible to benefit from feats that need martial proficiency). There is no good design reason for denying them this. Then separately, they need to fix ALL of the core sub-classes because they are ALL objectively bad. You may notice in the play test that they made an unarmed fighter subclass test with abilities that imitate several feats (and nothing else). My response on the play test survey was 'give this to the monk' over and over like I was talking to a child with badly done homework. Everyone is welcome to their opinion and play how you enjoy, but I can't enjoy the current Monk. I've tried and it's so bad that I responded to the 'fix' that if this will affect my decision on buying the revised rules at all. (end of rant. Thank you for indulging me).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shadowoflameth, post: 9171188, member: 62336"] With a standard array you can potentially have two 16s at 1st. That isn't the problem. The problem is that two abilities that in principal work well (Flurry and Stunning) are tied to a d4. The d4 Martial Arts damage is a non-ability because all the weapons in the game except the blowgun already do better including all of the monk weapons. If you have two 16s You aren't getting a fighting style at 1st as a monk (Fighting initiate; Unarmed Style) and so you do a d4 with your main attack unless you sacrifice something to do better. You quickly run out of Ki Points because both Flurry of Blows and Stunning Strike cost them. Then consider Step of the Wind costing Ki for something that a Skirmisher needs (and the rogue gets unlimited use of) and you have a character that is a less effective unarmed fighter than the fighter with an unarmed build and a less effective skirmisher than the rogue with a skirmisher build. The mediocre chance to stun a foe is not enough effectiveness to compensate for this and you don't get Stunning strike until after spending the 1st 5 levels nothing as effective as your allies in any role no matter how you build. They need to fix the Ki point cost AND the damage with Unarmed Strike, (BTW a d6 doesn't do that because of the feat I mentioned). Give them a fighting style at 1st level, and make FINALLY Monk unarmed Strikes a Martial Melee Weapon, and a Monk Weapon. (Making them eligible to benefit from feats that need martial proficiency). There is no good design reason for denying them this. Then separately, they need to fix ALL of the core sub-classes because they are ALL objectively bad. You may notice in the play test that they made an unarmed fighter subclass test with abilities that imitate several feats (and nothing else). My response on the play test survey was 'give this to the monk' over and over like I was talking to a child with badly done homework. Everyone is welcome to their opinion and play how you enjoy, but I can't enjoy the current Monk. I've tried and it's so bad that I responded to the 'fix' that if this will affect my decision on buying the revised rules at all. (end of rant. Thank you for indulging me). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does WotC view the Monk class as overtuned from their perspective?
Top