Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does WotC view the Monk class as overtuned from their perspective?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9218205" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>I am absolutely certain that WotC's design decision makers, specifically Jeremy Crawford thinks that all unarmed attacks and natural weapons and unarmoured or natural AC are drastically more powerful than they actually are.</p><p></p><p>I don't think it's a Stunning Strike thing or anything. I think it's really unarmed/natural weapons and unarmoured/natural AC which is what is causing the problem here. See for example, the design of the Brawler Fighter in the previous playtest packet - it had bizarre limitations, which from a balance perspective, made no sense, like it got a Bonus Action unarmed attack every round, but it wasn't allowed to use it as an attack, only a grab or shove. Nonsensical. It also didn't do very much unarmed damage.</p><p></p><p>Likewise feats allowing unarmed damage allow very low values, but WotC acts like they're dangerously powerful.</p><p></p><p>Similarly most races with natural weapons seem to be balanced as if the natural weapon was something serious and powerful, not a bad joke that most classes got literally zero use out of in their entire career.</p><p></p><p>There's nothing we can do about this - and I'd bet money that when Crawford is no longer in charge of D&D, this abruptly changes on the next edition or version or whatever.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9218205, member: 18"] I am absolutely certain that WotC's design decision makers, specifically Jeremy Crawford thinks that all unarmed attacks and natural weapons and unarmoured or natural AC are drastically more powerful than they actually are. I don't think it's a Stunning Strike thing or anything. I think it's really unarmed/natural weapons and unarmoured/natural AC which is what is causing the problem here. See for example, the design of the Brawler Fighter in the previous playtest packet - it had bizarre limitations, which from a balance perspective, made no sense, like it got a Bonus Action unarmed attack every round, but it wasn't allowed to use it as an attack, only a grab or shove. Nonsensical. It also didn't do very much unarmed damage. Likewise feats allowing unarmed damage allow very low values, but WotC acts like they're dangerously powerful. Similarly most races with natural weapons seem to be balanced as if the natural weapon was something serious and powerful, not a bad joke that most classes got literally zero use out of in their entire career. There's nothing we can do about this - and I'd bet money that when Crawford is no longer in charge of D&D, this abruptly changes on the next edition or version or whatever. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Does WotC view the Monk class as overtuned from their perspective?
Top