Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AaronOfBarbaria" data-source="post: 6931498" data-attributes="member: 6701872">Here are a couple of quotes that show why I am representing that claim in the way that I am, with bold added by me for emphsis:&quot;No. I see it as a place that WoTc feels can take some of the heat off&nbsp; them to create more content. I don't think they are dumb to think that&nbsp; magically fan crafted material suddenly becomes accepted. If they&nbsp; allowed the stuff in AL then I would agree, but even they should know by&nbsp; now that most DM's still do not allow fan created material.&quot;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 
Read more: <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?496904-Wanting-more-content-doesn-t-always-equate-to-wanting-tons-of-splat-options-so-please-stop/page13#ixzz4OVVprYxI" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?496904-Wanting-more-content-doesn-t-always-equate-to-wanting-tons-of-splat-options-so-please-stop/page13#ixzz4OVVprYxI</a>
&quot;There's been quality stuff out there for years now through various&nbsp; editions of D&amp;D. Doesn't change the fact that lots of DMs still do&nbsp; not allow things outside of what comes from Wizards. 5th edition hasn't&nbsp; changed that attitude&quot;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; 
Read more: <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?496904-Wanting-more-content-doesn-t-always-equate-to-wanting-tons-of-splat-options-so-please-stop/page24#ixzz4OVWClAUS" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?496904-Wanting-more-content-doesn-t-always-equate-to-wanting-tons-of-splat-options-so-please-stop/page24#ixzz4OVWClAUS</a>
Between those two statements, it is very reasonable for someone to think that &quot;fan created material&quot; meant literally all fan-created material, regardless of who the fan is or what kind of material it happened to be since there were no conditional stipulations provided or implied in any way. Similarly, it is very reasonable for someone to think that &quot;things outside of what comes from Wizards&quot; meant literally all things outside of what come from Wizards since, again, there were no conditional stipulations provided or implied in any way.The part I omitted doesn't actually change the part I kept in the quote and addressed because...What I was discussing with Shiroiken before you interjected your assumptive accusations that I was doing something wrong is why this poll was phrased in the way that was being called problematic. Because the poll isn't problematic, it's just specifically testing a claim that was made (and quoted above - it's the second bolded portion of the first quote presented) rather than seeking to figure out which sort of non-official material it is that people are using or which side of the DM screen that non-official material gets used on.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AaronOfBarbaria, post: 6931498, member: 6701872"] Here are a couple of quotes that show why I am representing that claim in the way that I am, with bold added by me for emphsis: "No. I see it as a place that WoTc feels can take some of the heat off them to create more content. I don't think they are [B]dumb to think that magically fan crafted material suddenly becomes accepted.[/B] If they allowed the stuff in AL then I would agree, but even they should know by now that [B]most DM's still do not allow fan created material.[/B]" [LEFT][COLOR=#000000] Read more: [URL]http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?496904-Wanting-more-content-doesn-t-always-equate-to-wanting-tons-of-splat-options-so-please-stop/page13#ixzz4OVVprYxI[/URL] [/COLOR][/LEFT] "There's been quality stuff out there for years now through various editions of D&D. Doesn't change [B]the fact that lots of DMs still do not allow things outside of what comes from Wizards.[/B] 5th edition hasn't changed that attitude" [LEFT][COLOR=#000000] Read more: [URL]http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?496904-Wanting-more-content-doesn-t-always-equate-to-wanting-tons-of-splat-options-so-please-stop/page24#ixzz4OVWClAUS[/URL] [/COLOR][/LEFT] Between those two statements, it is very reasonable for someone to think that "fan created material" meant literally [I]all [/I]fan-created material, regardless of who the fan is or what kind of material it happened to be since there were no conditional stipulations provided or implied in any way. Similarly, it is very reasonable for someone to think that "things outside of what comes from Wizards" meant literally [I]all[/I] things outside of what come from Wizards since, again, there were no conditional stipulations provided or implied in any way. The part I omitted doesn't actually change the part I kept in the quote and addressed because... What I was discussing with Shiroiken before you interjected your assumptive accusations that I was doing something wrong is why this poll was phrased in the way that was being called problematic. Because the poll isn't problematic, it's just specifically testing a claim that was made (and quoted above - it's the second bolded portion of the first quote presented) rather than seeking to figure out which sort of non-official material it is that people are using or which side of the DM screen that non-official material gets used on. [/QUOTE]

Verification