Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 6931851" data-attributes="member: 12731">Yeah, this is a good example why it's so difficult to discuss when we aren't specific enough. Banana begins with a statement including &quot;hostile to homebrew&quot;. Does he by that mean he demands access to 3PP options for his character? Apparently he does. Personally, I find that completely unreasonable.But.Then he significantly nuances that statement. By homebrew he might just mean something as innocous as making stealth rulings? Then I'd have to completely retract my opinion. After all, who doesn't need to make rulings on the clusterfrack that is the stealth rules? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />So what is it, Banana? Are you completely unreasonable or not? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />PS. For those having a bad reception, the point I've been advocating now for a number of posts is that unless we specify more what we mean, any discussion risks becoming pointless <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 6931851, member: 12731"] Yeah, this is a good example why it's so difficult to discuss when we aren't specific enough. Banana begins with a statement including "hostile to homebrew". Does he by that mean he demands access to 3PP options [B]for his character[/B]? Apparently he does. Personally, I find that [I]completely unreasonable[/I]. But. Then he significantly nuances that statement. By homebrew he might just mean something as innocous as making stealth rulings? Then I'd have to completely retract my opinion. After all, who doesn't need to make rulings on the clusterfrack that is the stealth rules? :D So what is it, Banana? Are you completely unreasonable or not? ;) PS. For those having a bad reception, the point I've been advocating now for a number of posts is that unless we specify more what we mean, any discussion risks becoming pointless :) [/QUOTE]

Verification