Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dog Soul Releases Cooper's Corrected Creature Codex: E - G
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Garnfellow" data-source="post: 3496115" data-attributes="member: 1223"><p>I bought the first volume of this series and, as a monster junkie, I thought it was pretty good. While these suggestions are probably much too late, I had several thoughts that I think would dramatically improve the utility of these products:</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Use the new statblock format. This one change would make this a "must have" product for many, many people who might otherwise pass these books by. Gods, I hate the old format and would pay good money for a product that had no corrections and just rearranged the statblocks into the new format. I know that there is some debate about whether the format is proprietary or not, but WotC has said it would entertain requests from OGL publishers to use the format, and maybe even more importantly, it sounds like Paizo has developed its own open format that keys off WotC official format -- that would be well worth investigating.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Add open descriptions to each monster. I don't know why WotC didn't make the physical description line to the SRD, but it would be very useful to have an open version out there.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For spellcasting creatures like the aboleth mage, add in the appropriate save DCs for the Typical Spells line.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For selected creatures (generally, the more complicated or powerful ones), adding a new tactics round-by-round description would be fantastic.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For selected creatures, add a "monster lore" table.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For selected creatures (generally, humanoids whose organization line specifically describes several classed leaders), add a couple of new advanced examples. A Cooperized kobold sergeant, hobgoblin leader, or gnoll lieutenant would be awesomely helpful. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For selected creatures, add in standard treasure descriptions or equipment.</li> </ul><p></p><p>I think your existing product is just great for the hard-core monster junkie, but probably won't offer enough juice for the casual monster user. I think adopting a few of these suggestions would greatly broaden the appeal beyond the hard-core.</p><p></p><p>P.S. I think the Challenge Rating for the aboleth mage is probably wrong. What constitutes an associated or non-associated class is almost always a judgment call, but based on the aboleth savant from <em>Lords of Madness</em>, it appears WotC has rethought the matter and concluded that wizard should probably be non-associated for an aboleth, which suggests that the aboleth mage's ought to be CR 13 instead of 17.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Garnfellow, post: 3496115, member: 1223"] I bought the first volume of this series and, as a monster junkie, I thought it was pretty good. While these suggestions are probably much too late, I had several thoughts that I think would dramatically improve the utility of these products: [list] [*]Use the new statblock format. This one change would make this a "must have" product for many, many people who might otherwise pass these books by. Gods, I hate the old format and would pay good money for a product that had no corrections and just rearranged the statblocks into the new format. I know that there is some debate about whether the format is proprietary or not, but WotC has said it would entertain requests from OGL publishers to use the format, and maybe even more importantly, it sounds like Paizo has developed its own open format that keys off WotC official format -- that would be well worth investigating. [*]Add open descriptions to each monster. I don't know why WotC didn't make the physical description line to the SRD, but it would be very useful to have an open version out there. [*]For spellcasting creatures like the aboleth mage, add in the appropriate save DCs for the Typical Spells line. [*]For selected creatures (generally, the more complicated or powerful ones), adding a new tactics round-by-round description would be fantastic. [*]For selected creatures, add a "monster lore" table. [*]For selected creatures (generally, humanoids whose organization line specifically describes several classed leaders), add a couple of new advanced examples. A Cooperized kobold sergeant, hobgoblin leader, or gnoll lieutenant would be awesomely helpful. [*]For selected creatures, add in standard treasure descriptions or equipment. [/list] I think your existing product is just great for the hard-core monster junkie, but probably won't offer enough juice for the casual monster user. I think adopting a few of these suggestions would greatly broaden the appeal beyond the hard-core. P.S. I think the Challenge Rating for the aboleth mage is probably wrong. What constitutes an associated or non-associated class is almost always a judgment call, but based on the aboleth savant from [i]Lords of Madness[/i], it appears WotC has rethought the matter and concluded that wizard should probably be non-associated for an aboleth, which suggests that the aboleth mage's ought to be CR 13 instead of 17. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dog Soul Releases Cooper's Corrected Creature Codex: E - G
Top