Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Doing away with "Bigger Fish" problem.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mostlyjoe" data-source="post: 5817875" data-attributes="member: 56540"><p>D&D has always suffered from a weird issue that is a byproduct of level scaling. We'll call it "Bigger Fish" as reference from the Darth & Droids Summon Bigger Fish joke, which is a great illustration of the problem.</p><p> </p><p>The issue in a nutshell is: Foes don't scale with level, and neither do allies. The expections are that as the players level up they interact with stronger NPCs and foes. The Drow Scouts give way to Generals and Generals to Gods. Etc. </p><p> </p><p>4E attempted to address this buy having the sliding scale of success on skill rolls and saves function based off of tiers, but the NPCs and monsters were all built with hard coded level expectations into them. 3.X's fix was character levels and or monster racial levels which added to complexity and didnt' always answer the problem of PC's over diversity of skill at higher level.</p><p> </p><p>Basically we wound up with demigods and dragons being the only viable foes because the level 1 Orc they ran acorss years ago will never ever reasonably challenge them again.</p><p> </p><p>One of the pieces that Monte/Mearls and Co brought up from the press conference that he flatter math of 5E will keep NPCs and Monsters more viable over levels and this is GREAT!~but...</p><p> </p><p>But if the math was completely flat you could do the inverse. Have higher level foes be won over by the PCs even at the lowest of levels. Sure the odds of it happening are astronomical, but the hope still remains.</p><p> </p><p>I'm not saying that some foes should be 'boss' level challenges, or far too complex to be taken out with a wild swing or spell casting. But it would be nice if the Drow General was as mortal as his Scout minions, just not as easy to get access too.</p><p> </p><p>This could avoid the leveled NPCs from adventures seeming too weak or powerful based on their described role.</p><p> </p><p>The catch is just how 'flat' does the math need to be to pull this off? How to you handle the force multiplier effect of PC skills and abilties? How do we avoid the 'Solo' monster templete and instead make that solo critter unique enough to pull on players? A lot of stuff I'm still trying to figure out in a game with levels.</p><p> </p><p>FantasyCrafts take was interesting but problematic, mostly from mechanic bloat issues.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mostlyjoe, post: 5817875, member: 56540"] D&D has always suffered from a weird issue that is a byproduct of level scaling. We'll call it "Bigger Fish" as reference from the Darth & Droids Summon Bigger Fish joke, which is a great illustration of the problem. The issue in a nutshell is: Foes don't scale with level, and neither do allies. The expections are that as the players level up they interact with stronger NPCs and foes. The Drow Scouts give way to Generals and Generals to Gods. Etc. 4E attempted to address this buy having the sliding scale of success on skill rolls and saves function based off of tiers, but the NPCs and monsters were all built with hard coded level expectations into them. 3.X's fix was character levels and or monster racial levels which added to complexity and didnt' always answer the problem of PC's over diversity of skill at higher level. Basically we wound up with demigods and dragons being the only viable foes because the level 1 Orc they ran acorss years ago will never ever reasonably challenge them again. One of the pieces that Monte/Mearls and Co brought up from the press conference that he flatter math of 5E will keep NPCs and Monsters more viable over levels and this is GREAT!~but... But if the math was completely flat you could do the inverse. Have higher level foes be won over by the PCs even at the lowest of levels. Sure the odds of it happening are astronomical, but the hope still remains. I'm not saying that some foes should be 'boss' level challenges, or far too complex to be taken out with a wild swing or spell casting. But it would be nice if the Drow General was as mortal as his Scout minions, just not as easy to get access too. This could avoid the leveled NPCs from adventures seeming too weak or powerful based on their described role. The catch is just how 'flat' does the math need to be to pull this off? How to you handle the force multiplier effect of PC skills and abilties? How do we avoid the 'Solo' monster templete and instead make that solo critter unique enough to pull on players? A lot of stuff I'm still trying to figure out in a game with levels. FantasyCrafts take was interesting but problematic, mostly from mechanic bloat issues. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Doing away with "Bigger Fish" problem.
Top