Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Domain Wizards in UA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Silveras" data-source="post: 1526853" data-attributes="member: 6271"><p>Actually, the Wizard in my new campaign declined the option; he's "just" a regular PH non-Specialist wizard. </p><p></p><p>My decision to use a Feat was based on the way it was implemented in the Forgotten Realms. Two of the Regional Feats there pretty much do the same thing. Since I did want to keep the regular PH non-Specialist as a viable option, I chose to do it the same way. If I had not wanted to go the Feat route, I would simply have made all non-Specialists Domain Wizards. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, it is up to the DM to decide whether the variant can or cannot be used side-by-side with the core class in his/her campaign. If a DM wants to limit Domain Wizards, for example, to coming from one specific land, characters from other lands must be either PH specialists or "standard" non-specialists.</p><p></p><p>I use many of the Class variants in UA to help give different lands a different feel. The Whirling Frenzy rage variant is found among the celtic-flavored barbarians of my world. I use the Totem Barbarians in three different areas, but which Totems are available in each area are different. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sadly, even though all such supplements do indeed say "Ask the DM first", there are a large number of players who manage to somehow not see that until you point it out to them, </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Other variants, like letting Clerics spontaneously trade their prepared spells for a Domain spell instead of a Cure, also do not work well side-by-side with the standard class. </p><p></p><p>The Battle Sorcerer is another. The loss of 1 spell each level (both known and usable per day) to a minimum of 1 is arguably a small price to pay for d8 HD, Cleric BAB, Proficiency in 1 Martial Weapon, and the ability to wear Light armor without Arcane Spell Failure. Some would say it is clearly a "better" Sorcerer, and outmodes the standard PH Sorcerer. </p><p></p><p>My point is that the Domain Wizard is not the only variant that does not co-exist well with its standard version; it is just the most obvious one. However, a lot still depends on how the DM chooses to bring it into the campaign.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Silveras, post: 1526853, member: 6271"] Actually, the Wizard in my new campaign declined the option; he's "just" a regular PH non-Specialist wizard. My decision to use a Feat was based on the way it was implemented in the Forgotten Realms. Two of the Regional Feats there pretty much do the same thing. Since I did want to keep the regular PH non-Specialist as a viable option, I chose to do it the same way. If I had not wanted to go the Feat route, I would simply have made all non-Specialists Domain Wizards. Well, it is up to the DM to decide whether the variant can or cannot be used side-by-side with the core class in his/her campaign. If a DM wants to limit Domain Wizards, for example, to coming from one specific land, characters from other lands must be either PH specialists or "standard" non-specialists. I use many of the Class variants in UA to help give different lands a different feel. The Whirling Frenzy rage variant is found among the celtic-flavored barbarians of my world. I use the Totem Barbarians in three different areas, but which Totems are available in each area are different. Sadly, even though all such supplements do indeed say "Ask the DM first", there are a large number of players who manage to somehow not see that until you point it out to them, Other variants, like letting Clerics spontaneously trade their prepared spells for a Domain spell instead of a Cure, also do not work well side-by-side with the standard class. The Battle Sorcerer is another. The loss of 1 spell each level (both known and usable per day) to a minimum of 1 is arguably a small price to pay for d8 HD, Cleric BAB, Proficiency in 1 Martial Weapon, and the ability to wear Light armor without Arcane Spell Failure. Some would say it is clearly a "better" Sorcerer, and outmodes the standard PH Sorcerer. My point is that the Domain Wizard is not the only variant that does not co-exist well with its standard version; it is just the most obvious one. However, a lot still depends on how the DM chooses to bring it into the campaign. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Domain Wizards in UA
Top