Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Promotions/Press
Domains at War: RPG Mass Combat as a Wargame
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tav_Behemoth" data-source="post: 6125507" data-attributes="member: 18017"><p>Domains at War was featured in the EN World news a while back - <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?331247-Folks-Attaching-a-Wargame-to-your-RPG-Alex-Macris-is-doing-just-that" target="_blank">Folks: Attaching a Wargame to your RPG? Alex Macris is doing just that.</a> - and now it's been successfully crowdfunded, with 19 days left to go in <a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/autarch/domains-at-war" target="_blank">its Kickstarter campaign</a>. </p><p></p><p>The goal of Domains at War is to extrapolate d20 combat from the 1:1 roleplaying scale to create a fast-playing wargame that's fun to play in itself, and can also serve as the mass combat system for any RPG that shares concepts like hit points and armor class.</p><p></p><p>One of the great things about this approach is that you can zoom in and out between the actions of individual heroes and monsters and the larger conflict they're involved in. Depending on how much you want the game to focus on any given situation, you can play it out at the table through roleplaying, an abstract resolution system, or a detailed tactical wargame. Each are based on the same set of rules, so they're familiar to players and give the same range of outcomes.</p><p></p><p>At Gary Con I ran two games using Domains at War, <em>Scouts of Zidium</em> and <em>Battle of Zidium</em>. In <em>Scouts</em>, the players went behind enemy lines to capture and interrogate a warlock who could give them information about the capabilities of the forces they'd face in <em>Battles</em>. We role-played this out using the Adventurer Conqueror King System, but if the group had wanted we could have used the system in <em>Domains at War: Campaigns</em> to abstract this process of gathering intelligence (and hiding your own movements from the enemy's scouts) into a few dice rolls. Likewise, the <em>Campaigns</em> rules for maintaining line of supply to armies on the march provides lots of opportunities for roleplaying or mass combat: the party could go on a mission to ambush the enemy wagons or convince a city to stop selling food to the enemy army, or they could just send a unit of troops to cut the supply line or besiege the offending city.</p><p></p><p>When we played the battle with <em>Domains at War: Battles</em>, the information about enemy spellcasters and commanders gained from the captive was decisive. As a wargame, it places a lot of emphasis on the role of individual commanders. When used as part of a RPG campaign, this means that the entire party is engaged; they're working together to coordinate the units they lead in a unified strategy, while also taking advantage of individual initiative. In the Gary Con game, the ultimate fate of the battle was decided by a duel between a barbarian archer and the Auran general, which we played out at the roleplaying scale. (Because we were using the epic battle rules, four RPG rounds passed for each mass combat round). When the general finally failed a saving throw against the barbarian's poisoned arrows, it was extremely satisfying to then zoom out to see how the loss of his morale benefits caused the units under his command to waver or rout. I've played with a number of other d20 mass combat systems, but none felt so seamlessly integrated between the individual focus of a RPG and the strategic command decisions of a wargame.</p><p></p><p><em>Campaigns</em> and <em>Battles</em> are complete and playtested, and available for Kickstarter backers to start playing with right away (check the <a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/autarch/domains-at-war/posts" target="_blank">first update</a> for links). The next stretch goal will combine both Campaigns and Battles into a single hardcover for folks who want it on their shelf in the same format as ACKS and the Player's Companion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tav_Behemoth, post: 6125507, member: 18017"] Domains at War was featured in the EN World news a while back - [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?331247-Folks-Attaching-a-Wargame-to-your-RPG-Alex-Macris-is-doing-just-that"]Folks: Attaching a Wargame to your RPG? Alex Macris is doing just that.[/URL] - and now it's been successfully crowdfunded, with 19 days left to go in [URL="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/autarch/domains-at-war"]its Kickstarter campaign[/URL]. The goal of Domains at War is to extrapolate d20 combat from the 1:1 roleplaying scale to create a fast-playing wargame that's fun to play in itself, and can also serve as the mass combat system for any RPG that shares concepts like hit points and armor class. One of the great things about this approach is that you can zoom in and out between the actions of individual heroes and monsters and the larger conflict they're involved in. Depending on how much you want the game to focus on any given situation, you can play it out at the table through roleplaying, an abstract resolution system, or a detailed tactical wargame. Each are based on the same set of rules, so they're familiar to players and give the same range of outcomes. At Gary Con I ran two games using Domains at War, [I]Scouts of Zidium[/I] and [I]Battle of Zidium[/I]. In [I]Scouts[/I], the players went behind enemy lines to capture and interrogate a warlock who could give them information about the capabilities of the forces they'd face in [I]Battles[/I]. We role-played this out using the Adventurer Conqueror King System, but if the group had wanted we could have used the system in [I]Domains at War: Campaigns[/I] to abstract this process of gathering intelligence (and hiding your own movements from the enemy's scouts) into a few dice rolls. Likewise, the [I]Campaigns[/I] rules for maintaining line of supply to armies on the march provides lots of opportunities for roleplaying or mass combat: the party could go on a mission to ambush the enemy wagons or convince a city to stop selling food to the enemy army, or they could just send a unit of troops to cut the supply line or besiege the offending city. When we played the battle with [I]Domains at War: Battles[/I], the information about enemy spellcasters and commanders gained from the captive was decisive. As a wargame, it places a lot of emphasis on the role of individual commanders. When used as part of a RPG campaign, this means that the entire party is engaged; they're working together to coordinate the units they lead in a unified strategy, while also taking advantage of individual initiative. In the Gary Con game, the ultimate fate of the battle was decided by a duel between a barbarian archer and the Auran general, which we played out at the roleplaying scale. (Because we were using the epic battle rules, four RPG rounds passed for each mass combat round). When the general finally failed a saving throw against the barbarian's poisoned arrows, it was extremely satisfying to then zoom out to see how the loss of his morale benefits caused the units under his command to waver or rout. I've played with a number of other d20 mass combat systems, but none felt so seamlessly integrated between the individual focus of a RPG and the strategic command decisions of a wargame. [I]Campaigns[/I] and [I]Battles[/I] are complete and playtested, and available for Kickstarter backers to start playing with right away (check the [URL="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/autarch/domains-at-war/posts"]first update[/URL] for links). The next stretch goal will combine both Campaigns and Battles into a single hardcover for folks who want it on their shelf in the same format as ACKS and the Player's Companion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Promotions/Press
Domains at War: RPG Mass Combat as a Wargame
Top