Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dominate Person - Sage Advise needed!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vegepygmy" data-source="post: 5744015" data-attributes="member: 40109"><p>I disagree completely. The dominated person will attempt to carry out the command (go kill Mialee) to the exclusion of all other activities except those necessary for day-to-day survival. That means "no dilly-dallying." It doesn't mean "use your bare hands rather than take the time to draw your sword." If Mialee is hiding within an impenetrable fortress, warded by magical traps and surrounded by elite guards, it would be absurd for a dominated wizard to attempt to the carry out the command (go kill Mialee) with the dagger he happens to have on him at that moment. That plan has no chance of success, and interpreting the spell to require such "planning" makes a mockery of the phrase "will attempt to."</p><p> </p><p>Furthermore, if you interpret the rules so, dominators will just become much more explicit in their commands: "First, spend ten minutes thinking of the best possible way you can go kill Mialee. Then memorize whatever spells will be helpful to you in executing your plan to go kill Mialee. Do anything else necessary to be successful at killing Mialee. Then, go kill Mialee."</p><p> </p><p>That is the wrong standard by which to measure the spell, however. DC 15 <em>should</em> be trivial for those unusual individuals who have actually trained the ability to Sense Motive.</p><p> </p><p>The correct standard is found on Table 4-3: a DC 15 skill check is "tough" by ordinary human standards. Only exceptional individuals will succeed easily...as they're supposed to. That's what makes them exceptional.</p><p> </p><p>Right. He's an exceptional individual. That's why he's an adventuring PC, and not the village carpenter.</p><p> </p><p>No. It's still <em>tough</em> to detect that someone is dominated; it's just easier than detecting that someone is charmed, which is (let's consult Table 4-3 again) "formidable."</p><p> </p><p>If your friend Bob gets dominated, he doesn't turn into a virtual zombie; that would be more like a DC 5 (easy) or DC 0 (very easy) Sense Motive check. It's more like: "Gee, Bob sure is quiet lately. And he seems to be really focused on going and killing Mialee...almost <em>too</em> focused."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vegepygmy, post: 5744015, member: 40109"] I disagree completely. The dominated person will attempt to carry out the command (go kill Mialee) to the exclusion of all other activities except those necessary for day-to-day survival. That means "no dilly-dallying." It doesn't mean "use your bare hands rather than take the time to draw your sword." If Mialee is hiding within an impenetrable fortress, warded by magical traps and surrounded by elite guards, it would be absurd for a dominated wizard to attempt to the carry out the command (go kill Mialee) with the dagger he happens to have on him at that moment. That plan has no chance of success, and interpreting the spell to require such "planning" makes a mockery of the phrase "will attempt to." Furthermore, if you interpret the rules so, dominators will just become much more explicit in their commands: "First, spend ten minutes thinking of the best possible way you can go kill Mialee. Then memorize whatever spells will be helpful to you in executing your plan to go kill Mialee. Do anything else necessary to be successful at killing Mialee. Then, go kill Mialee." That is the wrong standard by which to measure the spell, however. DC 15 [I]should[/I] be trivial for those unusual individuals who have actually trained the ability to Sense Motive. The correct standard is found on Table 4-3: a DC 15 skill check is "tough" by ordinary human standards. Only exceptional individuals will succeed easily...as they're supposed to. That's what makes them exceptional. Right. He's an exceptional individual. That's why he's an adventuring PC, and not the village carpenter. No. It's still [I]tough[/I] to detect that someone is dominated; it's just easier than detecting that someone is charmed, which is (let's consult Table 4-3 again) "formidable." If your friend Bob gets dominated, he doesn't turn into a virtual zombie; that would be more like a DC 5 (easy) or DC 0 (very easy) Sense Motive check. It's more like: "Gee, Bob sure is quiet lately. And he seems to be really focused on going and killing Mialee...almost [I]too[/I] focused." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dominate Person - Sage Advise needed!
Top