Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 8469439" data-attributes="member: 42856">I'd make a distinction here. Sure, session 0 is the place to determine agreement between participants of the social activities, but not all things are discussed the same. Let's say that one group might want a &quot;no evil character&quot; campaign, on the contrary another group could agree to play an evil Red Wizards campaign, where characters are expected to behave as slave-owning necromancers. Roleplaying approriately will make for an unsettling campaign if a player was not consenting to adresse these themes, but it's perfectly fine if you resolved the problem before starting. However, in this case, &quot;roleplaying appropriately&quot; a low INT characters implies not mocking disabled people. It'd imply roleplaying them respectfully. So, basically, the question is whether it's up to you to police your group in case someone is mocking disabled people (unless of course there was a specific agreement for roleplaying low INT characters in order to mock disabled people, in which case I'd advise to leave the group post haste...)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jfdlsjfd, post: 8469439, member: 42856"] I'd make a distinction here. Sure, session 0 is the place to determine agreement between participants of the social activities, but not all things are discussed the same. Let's say that one group might want a "no evil character" campaign, on the contrary another group could agree to play an evil Red Wizards campaign, where characters are expected to behave as slave-owning necromancers. Roleplaying approriately will make for an unsettling campaign if a player was not consenting to adresse these themes, but it's perfectly fine if you resolved the problem before starting. However, in this case, "roleplaying appropriately" a low INT characters implies [I]not[/I] mocking disabled people. It'd imply roleplaying them respectfully. So, basically, the question is whether it's up to you to police your group in case someone is mocking disabled people (unless of course there was a specific agreement for roleplaying low INT characters [I]in order to mock disabled people[/I], in which case I'd advise to leave the group post haste...) [/QUOTE]

Verification