Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dookie in the Sandbox?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takasi" data-source="post: 4865856" data-attributes="member: 20194"><p>I've noticed that there are many straw man arguments here.</p><p></p><p>I have said repeatedly that event based games put pressure on players, and IMO a railroad is when this pressure is intolerable. A racetrack or highway is not a railroad, but it sure is more of a railroad than a parking lot is. Some players want to go off road, but they either aren't given the right vehicles or the terrain is presented as unpassable, or just less pleasant than their expectations of a good time.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is where the setting makes a big difference. If the world provides more motivation for villains to act then their choices will overshadow those of the PCs. In darker times it's the heroes who want change, not villains. At least, it's not very difficult to create a realistic setting that offers this.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well first of all, the GM has to setup the status quo in the first place.</p><p></p><p>It's funny that you say the GM is a robot. If anything, I think the DM has to be MORE creative in this case. If the villains and events are happening independent of the PCs actions, then anyone can develop this for the DM. He can just pick up a module, or adventure path, or railroad, or whatever and crank out the world as given.</p><p></p><p>A sandbox GM has to be more reactive. Instead of plotting doom to the setting, he gets to make changes to the status quo in a positive way as the PCs improve the world. I think this actually fosters a more cooperative relationship between players and DMs and inspires fewer meta game attitudes, munchkinism and 'us vs them' attitudes.</p><p></p><p>Speaking of munchkinism, this style of play also makes it easier for PCs to choose their own challenges. It's just a matter of understanding the world around them and avoiding areas that are seen as too difficult. This lets the PCs make whatever type of character they want, even if it's not completely optimal. The DM is not the player's adversary and is not plotting their doom. Instead, the players are the ones risking their characters for the betterment of the game world.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Like I said, there can be a lot to do on a train. But you're not the one who is really driving it. The DM is moving the world without you while you coast along.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>First of all, you can have excitement within a world even if it's static. Second, player choices matter even more BECAUSE nothing happens when they make no choices.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takasi, post: 4865856, member: 20194"] I've noticed that there are many straw man arguments here. I have said repeatedly that event based games put pressure on players, and IMO a railroad is when this pressure is intolerable. A racetrack or highway is not a railroad, but it sure is more of a railroad than a parking lot is. Some players want to go off road, but they either aren't given the right vehicles or the terrain is presented as unpassable, or just less pleasant than their expectations of a good time. This is where the setting makes a big difference. If the world provides more motivation for villains to act then their choices will overshadow those of the PCs. In darker times it's the heroes who want change, not villains. At least, it's not very difficult to create a realistic setting that offers this. Well first of all, the GM has to setup the status quo in the first place. It's funny that you say the GM is a robot. If anything, I think the DM has to be MORE creative in this case. If the villains and events are happening independent of the PCs actions, then anyone can develop this for the DM. He can just pick up a module, or adventure path, or railroad, or whatever and crank out the world as given. A sandbox GM has to be more reactive. Instead of plotting doom to the setting, he gets to make changes to the status quo in a positive way as the PCs improve the world. I think this actually fosters a more cooperative relationship between players and DMs and inspires fewer meta game attitudes, munchkinism and 'us vs them' attitudes. Speaking of munchkinism, this style of play also makes it easier for PCs to choose their own challenges. It's just a matter of understanding the world around them and avoiding areas that are seen as too difficult. This lets the PCs make whatever type of character they want, even if it's not completely optimal. The DM is not the player's adversary and is not plotting their doom. Instead, the players are the ones risking their characters for the betterment of the game world. Like I said, there can be a lot to do on a train. But you're not the one who is really driving it. The DM is moving the world without you while you coast along. First of all, you can have excitement within a world even if it's static. Second, player choices matter even more BECAUSE nothing happens when they make no choices. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dookie in the Sandbox?
Top