Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Double sword, not as good as everyone thinks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrozenChrono" data-source="post: 4578022" data-attributes="member: 70738"><p>Forked from: <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showpost.php?postid=4577230" target="_blank"> Tempests destroying two-hander style? </a></p><p></p><p></p><p>Everyone seems to believe the double weapons are the best tempest fighter weapons hands down. I think we're reading the rules wrong. </p><p></p><p>You only get the +1 to hit, and +1 or +2 to damage when wielding two weapons. The book states that a double weapon is "like wielding a weapon in each hand" but it never specifies the context in which they should be treated that way other than the main hand and off hand being used in powers. It also specifies that only one end of the blade is counted as off hand.</p><p></p><p>Here's the relevant book text.</p><p></p><p>It says nothing about abilities, or feats that require having two weapons. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I could see people reading the rules differently than me, but even then RAW only the second damage die side has the off hand property. </p><p></p><p>Martial Power specifically states "when you wield two melee weapons" it's not stated to treat double weapons as two weapons anywhere but in reference to powers.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Now think about the implications for tempest fighters. Lets use the short sword as the base line.</p><p></p><p>+4 to hit</p><p>+2 damage</p><p>d6 </p><p></p><p></p><p>Spend a feat on the double sword and you get by one of my interpretations</p><p>+3 to hit</p><p>d8 </p><p>Defensive, but no bonus from Two weapon defense -1 to Ref Def</p><p>(this would make the double sword less effective than regular weapons for the tempest but keep it effective for anyone other than Tempest Fighters)</p><p></p><p></p><p>By the most I see allowable by RAW</p><p>+3 to hit main hand</p><p>+1 damage main hand</p><p>+4 to hit off hand</p><p>+2 damage off hand</p><p>d8</p><p>+1 to AC</p><p></p><p></p><p>Now let's spend a feat on another superior weapon, the Katar and you get</p><p>+4 to hit</p><p>+2 damage</p><p>d6</p><p>High Crit</p><p></p><p>Hmm, that second one almost seems . . . . balanced? reasonable? RAI?</p><p></p><p>the +3 to hit and +1 damage on the main hand of the double sword are made up for by it's d8 which is just better than the katar. The def property is matched against high crit.</p><p></p><p>Mwa ha! Now other weapon tempest fighters can have their day!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrozenChrono, post: 4578022, member: 70738"] Forked from: [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showpost.php?postid=4577230"] Tempests destroying two-hander style? [/URL] Everyone seems to believe the double weapons are the best tempest fighter weapons hands down. I think we're reading the rules wrong. You only get the +1 to hit, and +1 or +2 to damage when wielding two weapons. The book states that a double weapon is "like wielding a weapon in each hand" but it never specifies the context in which they should be treated that way other than the main hand and off hand being used in powers. It also specifies that only one end of the blade is counted as off hand. Here's the relevant book text. It says nothing about abilities, or feats that require having two weapons. I could see people reading the rules differently than me, but even then RAW only the second damage die side has the off hand property. Martial Power specifically states "when you wield two melee weapons" it's not stated to treat double weapons as two weapons anywhere but in reference to powers. Now think about the implications for tempest fighters. Lets use the short sword as the base line. +4 to hit +2 damage d6 Spend a feat on the double sword and you get by one of my interpretations +3 to hit d8 Defensive, but no bonus from Two weapon defense -1 to Ref Def (this would make the double sword less effective than regular weapons for the tempest but keep it effective for anyone other than Tempest Fighters) By the most I see allowable by RAW +3 to hit main hand +1 damage main hand +4 to hit off hand +2 damage off hand d8 +1 to AC Now let's spend a feat on another superior weapon, the Katar and you get +4 to hit +2 damage d6 High Crit Hmm, that second one almost seems . . . . balanced? reasonable? RAI? the +3 to hit and +1 damage on the main hand of the double sword are made up for by it's d8 which is just better than the katar. The def property is matched against high crit. Mwa ha! Now other weapon tempest fighters can have their day! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Double sword, not as good as everyone thinks
Top