Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Bond James Bond" data-source="post: 4581212" data-attributes="member: 77600">Yes, this is one way of balancing it.  Anyway, I think the Tempest just showed that double wepons where poorly designed. I think the damage dice of all double weapons should have been lowered by one from the beginning. A +3 d6/d6 double sword for example would be perfectly fine. Compared to short swords you would have to use on feat, but get +1AC, heavy and light blade type, and the benefit of having the enhancement bonus count on both ends (but just on "slot" or special weapon abilties). This seems pretty balanced to me. It would make the double sword a viable choice for any dual wielder but not THE Rogue or Tempest weapon it is now.</blockquote>