Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Will" data-source="post: 3960631" data-attributes="member: 5566">Some discussion on rpg.net about the annoyances of the DR/materials system (IE: DR/silver, and so on) got me thinking... there's a principle in game design that players enjoy mechanics of reward more than mechanics of punishment.The point of DR/materials rules is to reward forethought and cleverness on the part of the players; an archer who was resourceful enough to put some silver arrows and dragonbane arrows in her quiver, a warrior who bought silversheen once the group found out they would be facing werewolves.On the other hand, the feeling of being punished because you don't have the 'golf bag' of weapons is annoying. It was really terrible in 3.0, with DR 50/+4 and the like. Now, failing to bypass DR mainly is a problem for the people like the bard trying to supplement party's damage with arrows while he sings a song.My idea:Monsters have vulnerability to materials as part of their subtype. So a werewolf would be 'Humanoid, subtype: Shifter, Vulnerable to Silver'.   (Note: Any ideas on good terms for 'vulnerable to X' that sounds a little cooler?)Any item that fits the vulnerability acts as 'bane' to a creature with that subtype: +2 to attack, +2d6 damage. The weapon need not be enhanced, or even masterwork, and includes improvised weapons, like a silver candlestick.The price of materials is unchanged. This still encourages a bit of the golfbag syndrome, but note that it makes having a cold iron weapon for 40 gp or less attractive when it functions as Fey-bane.DMs may wish to remove certain bane options and require, instead, players choose materials. For example, given the great overlap of Cold Iron and Fey-bane, the DM may say that there are no Fey-bane weapons, and a character interested in such choose a cold iron weapon. Alternately, a DM may allow effectively double-bane weapons. (Thoughts on this?)One exception: an evil creature with DR /evil will be affected twice by a Holy weapon; once for the Holy effect that damages evil creatures, a second time for DR.Finally, creatures with DR swap it out for something else. Here's where I need help with the idea...+2 Natural Armor would effectively act like 'supernaturally tough except for the proper material, which ignores the natural armor (since it's +2 to hit).'Bonus to Con? Since DR typically scales by CR (5 per 5, more or less), swapping it for scaling hit point bonus seems sensible.</blockquote>

Verification