Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Dr Strange 2: In the Multiverse of Madness (Spoilers)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blue" data-source="post: 8686252" data-attributes="member: 20564"><p>For me, this takes away from both WandaVision and MotM, while adding very little since I don't think it needs it.</p><p></p><p>In WandaVision, Wanda is raw with just having killed Vision, and then having it still be for naught. Remember, that happened literally seconds before the blip. She is emotional fragile, raw, angry - including at herself, irrational. In this she is pushed by the intentional actions of SWORD with butchering and attempting to reanimate the body of her beloved. She Gets out of there but when she sees the partial house they were to live together in, it becomes an anchor for her delusional retreat. At this point there is no need for a Phoenix Force like control, and having it just diminishes the power of her grief.</p><p></p><p>At the end of WandaVision when she realizes what is happening she is able to put aside her family - kill Vision <em>again</em> as well as her real-to-her children. And remember what we learned in MotM - your dreams are things from other versions of you across the multiverse. So those are analogs of her real children. Yet she is able to put them aside and release the town. It's not a struggle of her vs. a P.F., it a struggle against herself and also Agatha, who wants the power for her own.</p><p></p><p>In MotM, she has a disturbingly different bent. She's attempting to be reasonable, which requires one person dies so she can be reuinted with her children. But it still is intentional killing. That's not the same Wanda as from WandaVision. Trying to say the same force was on her in both weakens it as it very obviously is manifesting in different ways (conscious v.s subconscious) with different levels of intentional harm. The change in behavior and the explained corruption influence fit hand in hand and don't need any additional explanation. Considering what it has done to the various Doctors Strange with little or lots of exposure it makes perfect sense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blue, post: 8686252, member: 20564"] For me, this takes away from both WandaVision and MotM, while adding very little since I don't think it needs it. In WandaVision, Wanda is raw with just having killed Vision, and then having it still be for naught. Remember, that happened literally seconds before the blip. She is emotional fragile, raw, angry - including at herself, irrational. In this she is pushed by the intentional actions of SWORD with butchering and attempting to reanimate the body of her beloved. She Gets out of there but when she sees the partial house they were to live together in, it becomes an anchor for her delusional retreat. At this point there is no need for a Phoenix Force like control, and having it just diminishes the power of her grief. At the end of WandaVision when she realizes what is happening she is able to put aside her family - kill Vision [I]again[/I] as well as her real-to-her children. And remember what we learned in MotM - your dreams are things from other versions of you across the multiverse. So those are analogs of her real children. Yet she is able to put them aside and release the town. It's not a struggle of her vs. a P.F., it a struggle against herself and also Agatha, who wants the power for her own. In MotM, she has a disturbingly different bent. She's attempting to be reasonable, which requires one person dies so she can be reuinted with her children. But it still is intentional killing. That's not the same Wanda as from WandaVision. Trying to say the same force was on her in both weakens it as it very obviously is manifesting in different ways (conscious v.s subconscious) with different levels of intentional harm. The change in behavior and the explained corruption influence fit hand in hand and don't need any additional explanation. Considering what it has done to the various Doctors Strange with little or lots of exposure it makes perfect sense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Dr Strange 2: In the Multiverse of Madness (Spoilers)
Top