Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Draco Historial - Dragons in D&D!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 6293199" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>I can totally get on board with streamlining. Having to make entire spell lists to use 2e and 3e dragons was <strong>not</strong> one of their strong suits. </p><p></p><p>But 4e's approach failed on two basic metrics for me with regards to the dragons.</p><p></p><p>First, it ditched the identity of the dragons as conveyed by their magical abilities in 2e/3e. As an example, blue dragons in 4e were dire pikachus -- great with a bolt of lightning in a fight. They weren't the clever illusionists who got their victims lost in the desert while obliterating water supplies that the 2e abilities helped them be for me. The latter is much more interesting to me than the former. </p><p></p><p>Second, it narrowed their focus to the fight. Since combat is only one part of D&D for me, and I still need rules support for the rest of the game, this made them boring and uninteresting to me. I can imagine using a blue dragon that uses mirages and destroys water in play. A blue dragon that just crackles with lightning doesn't inspire me to do anything with it, really. Got no reason to fight it. </p><p></p><p>The simplification was a good thing, and I hope 5e keeps it simple. Spell lists are not a thing I want to go back to. I just hope it adds back in those two things that 4e dragons lacked for me -- the thematic abilities that made each color interesting and unique, and a context beyond the 30 minutes it'll take to reduce that sack of XP to 0 HP. </p><p></p><p>I imagine 5e dragons, like the beholder mentioned in today's Q&A, are going to have a "non-legendary, non-laired" mode they can run on, ("legendary" and "lair" seem like things you can add to a critter), which sounds like it'll be useful for anyone wanting a simpler dragon. I just hope that simple dragon still evokes the unique abilities of the 2e/3e era dragons -- that my black dragons unleash insect plagues and taint wells, that my blue dragons use illusions and eradicate water, that my green dragons have charms and nature manipulation that rival the fey...</p><p></p><p>Those things are fun gameplay elements for me. I imagine they won't be hard to add if 5e doesn't do it by default (it's likely going to be easy to take those spells and just say, "the dragon can use 'em."), but I'd be pleased to see those abilities in there. Given 5e's general "good ideas from history" vibe, I wouldn't be shocked. </p><p></p><p>But if 5e gold dragons don't grant luck and 5e white dragons don't control the weather, I'm probably not going to be that enthusiastic about 'em.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 6293199, member: 2067"] I can totally get on board with streamlining. Having to make entire spell lists to use 2e and 3e dragons was [b]not[/b] one of their strong suits. But 4e's approach failed on two basic metrics for me with regards to the dragons. First, it ditched the identity of the dragons as conveyed by their magical abilities in 2e/3e. As an example, blue dragons in 4e were dire pikachus -- great with a bolt of lightning in a fight. They weren't the clever illusionists who got their victims lost in the desert while obliterating water supplies that the 2e abilities helped them be for me. The latter is much more interesting to me than the former. Second, it narrowed their focus to the fight. Since combat is only one part of D&D for me, and I still need rules support for the rest of the game, this made them boring and uninteresting to me. I can imagine using a blue dragon that uses mirages and destroys water in play. A blue dragon that just crackles with lightning doesn't inspire me to do anything with it, really. Got no reason to fight it. The simplification was a good thing, and I hope 5e keeps it simple. Spell lists are not a thing I want to go back to. I just hope it adds back in those two things that 4e dragons lacked for me -- the thematic abilities that made each color interesting and unique, and a context beyond the 30 minutes it'll take to reduce that sack of XP to 0 HP. I imagine 5e dragons, like the beholder mentioned in today's Q&A, are going to have a "non-legendary, non-laired" mode they can run on, ("legendary" and "lair" seem like things you can add to a critter), which sounds like it'll be useful for anyone wanting a simpler dragon. I just hope that simple dragon still evokes the unique abilities of the 2e/3e era dragons -- that my black dragons unleash insect plagues and taint wells, that my blue dragons use illusions and eradicate water, that my green dragons have charms and nature manipulation that rival the fey... Those things are fun gameplay elements for me. I imagine they won't be hard to add if 5e doesn't do it by default (it's likely going to be easy to take those spells and just say, "the dragon can use 'em."), but I'd be pleased to see those abilities in there. Given 5e's general "good ideas from history" vibe, I wouldn't be shocked. But if 5e gold dragons don't grant luck and 5e white dragons don't control the weather, I'm probably not going to be that enthusiastic about 'em. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Draco Historial - Dragons in D&D!
Top