Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dragon 305 back cover ad-worse then the F-word?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Johnny Wilson" data-source="post: 708603" data-attributes="member: 6000"><p>Note to all conspiracy buffs:</p><p></p><p>1) Paizo does not do the creative on the ads.</p><p></p><p>2) I personally blew it when I did the review of the dummy book because I didn't look closely enough at the ad to notice the provocative stuff (she's a demon with wings...okay?). I know that's hard to believe, but I didn't notice the anatomical "excitement" until one of my editors held up a printed copy of the back cover and asked me if I realized what we had done. You can disagree with a lot of the stuff I've done and you can point the finger at me directly on this one, BUT the truth is that this one was carelessness, not a plan to create additional shock value.</p><p></p><p>3) We did not edit George RR Martin's vocabulary because:</p><p> a) we figured that those who would be interested in the</p><p> novella would already know what to expect;</p><p> b) we didn't want to be accused of bawdlerizing a novella</p><p> that would appear in its original form when the novel is</p><p> published; and</p><p> c) we don't hire our favorite authors to put restrictions on</p><p> them.</p><p> You should not expect to see either the S-bomb or the </p><p> F-bomb in traditional Dragon articles. Believe it or not, we</p><p> have turned down more than one story by significant</p><p> authors because the material was more sexual in nature</p><p> and didn't fit the game world. It would be hard to argue</p><p> that Martin's fiction doesn't tie in well with the game world.</p><p></p><p>4) I'm hoping for some "normal" issues without any salacious</p><p> material for the conspiratorial grist mill.</p><p></p><p>Johnny L. Wilson</p><p>Publisher, Dragon magazine</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Johnny Wilson, post: 708603, member: 6000"] Note to all conspiracy buffs: 1) Paizo does not do the creative on the ads. 2) I personally blew it when I did the review of the dummy book because I didn't look closely enough at the ad to notice the provocative stuff (she's a demon with wings...okay?). I know that's hard to believe, but I didn't notice the anatomical "excitement" until one of my editors held up a printed copy of the back cover and asked me if I realized what we had done. You can disagree with a lot of the stuff I've done and you can point the finger at me directly on this one, BUT the truth is that this one was carelessness, not a plan to create additional shock value. 3) We did not edit George RR Martin's vocabulary because: a) we figured that those who would be interested in the novella would already know what to expect; b) we didn't want to be accused of bawdlerizing a novella that would appear in its original form when the novel is published; and c) we don't hire our favorite authors to put restrictions on them. You should not expect to see either the S-bomb or the F-bomb in traditional Dragon articles. Believe it or not, we have turned down more than one story by significant authors because the material was more sexual in nature and didn't fit the game world. It would be hard to argue that Martin's fiction doesn't tie in well with the game world. 4) I'm hoping for some "normal" issues without any salacious material for the conspiratorial grist mill. Johnny L. Wilson Publisher, Dragon magazine [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dragon 305 back cover ad-worse then the F-word?
Top