Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Christian" data-source="post: 892654" data-attributes="member: 381">Well, I'm not sure what a 'standard D&D game' is either. But I'm pretty darn sure that that isn't it ... I am perfectly willing to concede that the 3.5E ranger is overpowered in a campaign world in which the spellcasters have been heavily nerfed. In fact, I'd have to say that it sounds like the 3.0 ranger is overpowered in such a campaign. It might be a good idea to include these kinds of details when you pronounce judgment, to give some context. Eg. rather than:Expand that paranthetical quote to something like:(It may be balanced in many or most campaigns, but I run an extremely low-magic campaign in which every class's spellcasting and/or supernatural abilities have been removed or sharply limited, so I'd need to do something comparable to this ranger class before I could include it.)Just saying that you run a 'low magic-item' campaign doesn't make it clear how far off the beaten track yours is, and (I think) led people to the conclusion that you were saying something much stronger than you were.</blockquote>