Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dragon 334, Malhavoc's Surprise = Ptolus
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Monte At Home" data-source="post: 2403664" data-attributes="member: 1335"><p>I was talking about was honest human emotion, not intellectual analysis. Of course we realized that there would be mistakes in our work, and that there would be further additions and editions to the game. There's a huge difference between knowing intellectually that there will be further development on your work, and a business manager looking you in the eye and telling you that he's planning on revising something you've been working on for 3 years and aren't even quite finished yet. Just like there's a big difference between realizing that our work wasn't going to be perfect and actual planned obselescence (which is what the post I was initially addressing was talking about).</p><p></p><p>We knew from day 1, of course, that there would be a 4th edition D&D. Probably about a year into 3E development, I started keeping a file called "4th edition," that contained ideas for things that could be done with the rules, but were too drastic a change from 2nd edition. Many were the next logical step for something we did for 3E, but would have been inappropriate since the audience wouldn't have seen the middle step. In other words, it would have been like going from 2E to 4E. We, of course, had no idea when 4E would come along--that wasn't really the point. The point was that the rules were a continually evolving process. </p><p></p><p>But even that level of planning aside, I'm fairly confident that I can speak for everyone on the team when I say that none of us thought what we did was perfect. (Does this really need be said? I've never met a writer or designer who thought their work was perfect. Well, OK, one.) We were making little changes right up to the last minute, and even at one minute after the last minute we were finding things wrong that we wish we could have fixed. Later on, we worked together to develop the errata lists. There were no illusions of perfection.</p><p></p><p>As a designer, my outlook has always been to be ambitious enough to strive for perfection, but not to be so arrogant (or naive) as to ever think you achieved it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Monte At Home, post: 2403664, member: 1335"] I was talking about was honest human emotion, not intellectual analysis. Of course we realized that there would be mistakes in our work, and that there would be further additions and editions to the game. There's a huge difference between knowing intellectually that there will be further development on your work, and a business manager looking you in the eye and telling you that he's planning on revising something you've been working on for 3 years and aren't even quite finished yet. Just like there's a big difference between realizing that our work wasn't going to be perfect and actual planned obselescence (which is what the post I was initially addressing was talking about). We knew from day 1, of course, that there would be a 4th edition D&D. Probably about a year into 3E development, I started keeping a file called "4th edition," that contained ideas for things that could be done with the rules, but were too drastic a change from 2nd edition. Many were the next logical step for something we did for 3E, but would have been inappropriate since the audience wouldn't have seen the middle step. In other words, it would have been like going from 2E to 4E. We, of course, had no idea when 4E would come along--that wasn't really the point. The point was that the rules were a continually evolving process. But even that level of planning aside, I'm fairly confident that I can speak for everyone on the team when I say that none of us thought what we did was perfect. (Does this really need be said? I've never met a writer or designer who thought their work was perfect. Well, OK, one.) We were making little changes right up to the last minute, and even at one minute after the last minute we were finding things wrong that we wish we could have fixed. Later on, we worked together to develop the errata lists. There were no illusions of perfection. As a designer, my outlook has always been to be ambitious enough to strive for perfection, but not to be so arrogant (or naive) as to ever think you achieved it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dragon 334, Malhavoc's Surprise = Ptolus
Top