Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 5208756" data-attributes="member: 2067">If being a product of 4e, for example, means cramming in the Feywild even when it might hurt the feel of the setting, then I think the priorities of the Campaign Setting line are skewed away from what I, as a big consumer of settings, am looking for. Not that every setting needs to do something new and fresh and shockingly different, just that a setting which, in part, thrives on the shockingly different, shouldn't be boringly the same. A setting's feel and special flavor is the reason I choose to play in it. If this is the limits of 4e's official creative power, then it's a little sad.On the other hand, maybe something like Gamma World would be what I wanted in a setting. Though GW seems to have onerous collectible elements, at its heart, it seems to take the 4e rules and jump into a different place with them. Which is probably more what I want out of a setting....and now part of me is wondering at a GW/Dark Sun mashup, and going fun places... <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/devil.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":devil:" title="Devil    :devil:" data-shortname=":devil:" /></blockquote>