Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dragon 338: Returning to Athas, part1
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wik" data-source="post: 5210720" data-attributes="member: 40177"><p>Now where's the fun in THAT!? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> </p><p></p><p>As I've said before, most of what I'm saying is purely in an "academic" sense - I already know a lot of what I'll be doing in my campaign, mining these new ideas on a case by case basis. And feywild is most likely out. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, I get that there are small spots. But it seems like these small spots will be occuring every time the eladrin fey steps, right? Which means... those small spots will be everywhere that there is a combat happening that includes an eladrin. </p><p></p><p>Hm. There seems to be a lot of "Small spots", eh?</p><p></p><p>And then we get into "if they're so small, why make them there at all?" part of the argument. Why does that oasis need to be its own plane? Dark Sun has plenty of crazy stuff - to make it stand as somehow apart from Athas kind of belittles the baseline setting. </p><p></p><p>And for what it's worth, you're taking my quote completely out of context. I was looking at Rich Baker's blog, who said, flat out "We need to include Eladrin, as we don't want to alienate the guy that always plays an Eladrin", and yet they specificially say they're going to take out the divine power source. Those are two conflicting statements, which makes me wonder about the logic behind including Eladrin - they were willing to cut out a whole slew of classes, which seem like a much bigger cut... so why Eladrin?</p><p></p><p>They are not equivalent to me. I think it's obvious that they are not. So I'm wondering at the logic. Because it makes no sense, as far as I can see. </p><p></p><p>And they're not just "adding a race" - I can get behind that. I would have no problem with that (I never once moaned about the Dragonborn being added - though I did draw the line at Tieflings, for much the same reason as Eladrin). What I am having a problem with is adding a new planar element to the game that does not really need to be there, to justify the inclusion of a PC race.</p><p></p><p>Imagine if the designers said "we really need to include tieflings in the game, so there's going to have to be a hell. So, hey, here's the new Abyssal planes in Athas - they're like normal hell, only dialled to 11!".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wik, post: 5210720, member: 40177"] Now where's the fun in THAT!? ;) As I've said before, most of what I'm saying is purely in an "academic" sense - I already know a lot of what I'll be doing in my campaign, mining these new ideas on a case by case basis. And feywild is most likely out. No, I get that there are small spots. But it seems like these small spots will be occuring every time the eladrin fey steps, right? Which means... those small spots will be everywhere that there is a combat happening that includes an eladrin. Hm. There seems to be a lot of "Small spots", eh? And then we get into "if they're so small, why make them there at all?" part of the argument. Why does that oasis need to be its own plane? Dark Sun has plenty of crazy stuff - to make it stand as somehow apart from Athas kind of belittles the baseline setting. And for what it's worth, you're taking my quote completely out of context. I was looking at Rich Baker's blog, who said, flat out "We need to include Eladrin, as we don't want to alienate the guy that always plays an Eladrin", and yet they specificially say they're going to take out the divine power source. Those are two conflicting statements, which makes me wonder about the logic behind including Eladrin - they were willing to cut out a whole slew of classes, which seem like a much bigger cut... so why Eladrin? They are not equivalent to me. I think it's obvious that they are not. So I'm wondering at the logic. Because it makes no sense, as far as I can see. And they're not just "adding a race" - I can get behind that. I would have no problem with that (I never once moaned about the Dragonborn being added - though I did draw the line at Tieflings, for much the same reason as Eladrin). What I am having a problem with is adding a new planar element to the game that does not really need to be there, to justify the inclusion of a PC race. Imagine if the designers said "we really need to include tieflings in the game, so there's going to have to be a hell. So, hey, here's the new Abyssal planes in Athas - they're like normal hell, only dialled to 11!". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dragon 338: Returning to Athas, part1
Top