Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="BOZ" data-source="post: 3355239" data-attributes="member: 1241">glad you liked them.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />truth be told, i'm torn between my similar feelings for that same argument, and the idea of just getting 'em done for those who want it.most likely, Shade and i will eventually send in a query, and it will be rejected.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />  but if it's not... then i guess we'll go with it.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />of course, there are several named elemental lords already in existence, so it's not a matter of creating new ones, and it's long been established that there are more archomentals in the planes than just the known ones.  it might be best to just stop at "the big nine" we've already done, but it might just be interesting to pursue the rest.</blockquote>