Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dragon 361 Editorial
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Spatula" data-source="post: 3957923" data-attributes="member: 2198"><p>Well, Wizards gains nothing from people who don't switch to 4e, so honestly, why cater to them (looking at it from a business POV). If you're not going to buy / use 4e, you won't be subscribing to D&DI anyway. I don't think that anyone disputes that WOTC is not going to be supporting 3e once 4e arrives.</p><p></p><p>Consider if over the next 6 months, online Dragon is filled with the most amazing new 3.5 crunch ever. Summer 2008 arrives, 4e is published, online content has to be paid for, and you have no intention of abandoning 3e. Are you going to pay for 4e rules content in the new Dragon? No. What they do in the meantime will have no bearing on that decision for someone who is not interested in the new edition.</p><p></p><p>I think that, ideally, they should be trying to convert people to 4e (and to paying for online content) with new articles that have dual 3e/4e stats - the 4e stats will not be very useful right away, but will pique people's interest and will give them an idea of what's to come when Dragon is no longer free. It will also make that content still usable after the new edition is published. However, it is an extra drain on resources (you'd probably need one of your 4e developers to do the 4e stats) and perhaps they don't have the manpower or money for it.</p><p></p><p>I also think that ideally they could have handled the Dragon / Dungeon thing a HELL of a lot better, publicity-wise, from day 1. They fumbled the ball with the Pazio thing, and here they're explaining themselves in business terms, what makes sense for the bottom line - which is logical, and their reasoning makes sense, but it won't endear you to people who are looking to be reassured. Public relations isn't about the unvarnished truth. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Spatula, post: 3957923, member: 2198"] Well, Wizards gains nothing from people who don't switch to 4e, so honestly, why cater to them (looking at it from a business POV). If you're not going to buy / use 4e, you won't be subscribing to D&DI anyway. I don't think that anyone disputes that WOTC is not going to be supporting 3e once 4e arrives. Consider if over the next 6 months, online Dragon is filled with the most amazing new 3.5 crunch ever. Summer 2008 arrives, 4e is published, online content has to be paid for, and you have no intention of abandoning 3e. Are you going to pay for 4e rules content in the new Dragon? No. What they do in the meantime will have no bearing on that decision for someone who is not interested in the new edition. I think that, ideally, they should be trying to convert people to 4e (and to paying for online content) with new articles that have dual 3e/4e stats - the 4e stats will not be very useful right away, but will pique people's interest and will give them an idea of what's to come when Dragon is no longer free. It will also make that content still usable after the new edition is published. However, it is an extra drain on resources (you'd probably need one of your 4e developers to do the 4e stats) and perhaps they don't have the manpower or money for it. I also think that ideally they could have handled the Dragon / Dungeon thing a HELL of a lot better, publicity-wise, from day 1. They fumbled the ball with the Pazio thing, and here they're explaining themselves in business terms, what makes sense for the bottom line - which is logical, and their reasoning makes sense, but it won't endear you to people who are looking to be reassured. Public relations isn't about the unvarnished truth. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dragon 361 Editorial
Top