Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dragon 363 Blurb
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="delericho" data-source="post: 4109168" data-attributes="member: 22424"><p>In my opinion, it would have been better (for the customers, but also for WotC) had they treated the publication of eDragon and eDungeon exactly like publication of the physical magazines, only published in pdf rather than physical form.</p><p></p><p>By that I mean that Dragon 360 should have been published exactly one month after 359, as a single dump of information, and should have contained the same volume and types of articles as previous Dragons had. Likewise, Dungeon 151 should have been published exactly one month after 151 as a single dump of information, and contained the same mix of adventures and articles as 150.</p><p></p><p>I also believe they would have been better served by adopting the old policy of "we publish on time unless someone is going to sue".</p><p></p><p>There are two reasons for this:</p><p></p><p>1) It forces a discipline on WotC's Dragon/Dungeon department (or whoever is filling that role) that they publish regularly and on time. This means that when 4e hits, and they're scrambling around to put out the magazines, and push the game fully, and try to bring people into the DDI, and all the other things that are going to be crazy come June, they know what they're doing with at least part of the equation.</p><p></p><p>2) You never get a second chance to make a first impression. My impression of eDragon (especially) at the moment is that it will publish when they can be bothered, it generally won't contain anything of use to my game, and it frankly isn't worth looking out for, never mind subscribing to and reading cover-to-cover each month (as I did previously).</p><p></p><p>And, yes, I believe they should have continued covering 3.5e, in exactly the same way that the magazines supported 2nd Edition right up until the publication of 3e. (To be fair - eDungeon is much better in this regard than eDragon.) They should be doing this not because it's particularly important to support the current edition, but rather because they need to prove they can put out a quality product each month, providing things that are directly relevant to the game, and that are worth the price of admission. Since no-one can really use support for 4e at the moment, that means supporting 3.5e.</p><p></p><p>"What price of admission?" you ask. While it is true that the e-magazines are currently free, the intention from WotC is that this will not always be so. When they start charging, people will base their buying decisions on the quality of the magazines while they were free. Saying, "it's much better now" will only take them so far - if they have a reputation for missed deadlines and underwhelming quality, then that's going to hurt them.</p><p></p><p>IMO, of course.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="delericho, post: 4109168, member: 22424"] In my opinion, it would have been better (for the customers, but also for WotC) had they treated the publication of eDragon and eDungeon exactly like publication of the physical magazines, only published in pdf rather than physical form. By that I mean that Dragon 360 should have been published exactly one month after 359, as a single dump of information, and should have contained the same volume and types of articles as previous Dragons had. Likewise, Dungeon 151 should have been published exactly one month after 151 as a single dump of information, and contained the same mix of adventures and articles as 150. I also believe they would have been better served by adopting the old policy of "we publish on time unless someone is going to sue". There are two reasons for this: 1) It forces a discipline on WotC's Dragon/Dungeon department (or whoever is filling that role) that they publish regularly and on time. This means that when 4e hits, and they're scrambling around to put out the magazines, and push the game fully, and try to bring people into the DDI, and all the other things that are going to be crazy come June, they know what they're doing with at least part of the equation. 2) You never get a second chance to make a first impression. My impression of eDragon (especially) at the moment is that it will publish when they can be bothered, it generally won't contain anything of use to my game, and it frankly isn't worth looking out for, never mind subscribing to and reading cover-to-cover each month (as I did previously). And, yes, I believe they should have continued covering 3.5e, in exactly the same way that the magazines supported 2nd Edition right up until the publication of 3e. (To be fair - eDungeon is much better in this regard than eDragon.) They should be doing this not because it's particularly important to support the current edition, but rather because they need to prove they can put out a quality product each month, providing things that are directly relevant to the game, and that are worth the price of admission. Since no-one can really use support for 4e at the moment, that means supporting 3.5e. "What price of admission?" you ask. While it is true that the e-magazines are currently free, the intention from WotC is that this will not always be so. When they start charging, people will base their buying decisions on the quality of the magazines while they were free. Saying, "it's much better now" will only take them so far - if they have a reputation for missed deadlines and underwhelming quality, then that's going to hurt them. IMO, of course. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dragon 363 Blurb
Top