Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dragon 370 - Design & Development: Cosmology
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sir Brennen" data-source="post: 4583372" data-attributes="member: 553"><p>Changing the way these planes are set up in 4E opens up MORE choices for a DM to set adventures. Including the choice you seem to prefer of just saying "You can't go to this plane" or "You can only go to the City of Brass on this plane". </p><p></p><p>In fact, I find it funny that you're basically arguing <em>for </em>limits. The Inner Planes of previous editions did not present as many options for a DM or players to explore as the current setup, which is the point. </p><p></p><p>It's easier to start with a model more open to setting adventures and let the DM exclude the options he'd rather not have than start limited and have nothing to support the DM's that want to open it up with more options.</p><p></p><p>The MotP is going to have info on setting up your own cosmologies as well. So options for your own setup will still be there. No DM will be straitjacketed with the World Axis if he doesn't want to be for his own campaign. It's just that WotC's <em>published</em> material has a baseline the cosmology so that the PHB, DMG and MM material will work with as presented in all settings. And, as was mentioned in the interview, it's still flexible enough to allow something like Eberron's shifting planes to be utilized within it as well, so it'll have a unique cosmology built on the <em>framework</em> of the World Axis.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sir Brennen, post: 4583372, member: 553"] Changing the way these planes are set up in 4E opens up MORE choices for a DM to set adventures. Including the choice you seem to prefer of just saying "You can't go to this plane" or "You can only go to the City of Brass on this plane". In fact, I find it funny that you're basically arguing [I]for [/I]limits. The Inner Planes of previous editions did not present as many options for a DM or players to explore as the current setup, which is the point. It's easier to start with a model more open to setting adventures and let the DM exclude the options he'd rather not have than start limited and have nothing to support the DM's that want to open it up with more options. The MotP is going to have info on setting up your own cosmologies as well. So options for your own setup will still be there. No DM will be straitjacketed with the World Axis if he doesn't want to be for his own campaign. It's just that WotC's [i]published[/i] material has a baseline the cosmology so that the PHB, DMG and MM material will work with as presented in all settings. And, as was mentioned in the interview, it's still flexible enough to allow something like Eberron's shifting planes to be utilized within it as well, so it'll have a unique cosmology built on the [i]framework[/i] of the World Axis. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dragon 370 - Design & Development: Cosmology
Top