Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 4586819" data-attributes="member: 61155">Wait, wait, wait - are you saying that, in order for you to admit you are wrong, you are unwilling to accept people stepping forward and outright stating that they felt some of these things were problem, and instead demand online threads as the only proof you will accept?&nbsp;Look, I can accept that you found this odd and were dubious about whether any gamers actually thought this was an issue. But you have gamers, in this thread, saying that was the case. To still insist that this problems were imaginary isn't just dismissive - it is insulting. You are basically saying that we are lying about our experiences, or that there is some sort of conspiracy to invent support for these decisions made for 4E.&nbsp;Could it possibly be that the reason for the support is that there are people that honestly agree with the decisions made and the reasons behind them??&nbsp;I'm not saying you have to agree with them. I'm not even saying you are wrong to initially not believe anyone could think these things were problems. But it seems pretty irrational that, after people have directly told you that they did in fact think these things, you claim it is only natural to still express disbelief...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 4586819, member: 61155"] Wait, wait, wait - are you saying that, in order for you to admit you are wrong, you are unwilling to accept people stepping forward and [I]outright stating [/I]that they felt some of these things were problem, and instead demand online threads as the only proof you will accept? Look, I can accept that you found this odd and were dubious about whether any gamers actually thought this was an issue. [I]But you have gamers, in this thread, saying that was the case[/I]. To still insist that this problems were imaginary isn't just dismissive - it is [I]insulting[/I]. You are basically saying that we are lying about our experiences, or that there is some sort of conspiracy to invent support for these decisions made for 4E. Could it possibly be that the reason for the support is that there are people that honestly agree with the decisions made and the reasons behind them?? I'm not saying [I]you[/I] have to agree with them. I'm not even saying you are wrong to initially not believe anyone could think these things were problems. But it seems pretty irrational that, after people have directly told you that they did in fact think these things, you claim it is only natural to [I]still [/I]express disbelief... [/QUOTE]

Verification