Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dragon 397: Letters To The Editor Up
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aegeri" data-source="post: 5490210" data-attributes="member: 78116"><p>Yeah just think of those <em>poor players</em> making PHB1 characters, with all their billions of feats and options available. One can't bear the thought of publishing any other feat or powers in the CB as long as the PHB classes are well supported. Who cares how much is published for those under supported classes anyway? Nobody plays them because they have hardly any options to begin with! Why on earth would giving them cool new options do anything? I mean just think of the poor fighters who may see content for other classes cluttering up their CB. Won't someone think of them and all their options they already have?</p><p></p><p>Clearly what we need is someone to describe how to reflavor the existing power cleave, into hitting an enemy and farting so fouly upon another opponent that it gives up the fight and simply dies. <em>This</em> is what we need more of. Not mechanical support for several classes, which really could warrant some support. Support that would not add any more feat/power bloat to characters that are - by definition - feat/power bloated already anyway. I mean it's not like Wizards would be releasing an entire book next month with more powers for the Wizard, the PHB1 class with some of the most support in the entire...</p><p></p><p><em>Oh...</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Wait</em>....</p><p></p><p>[spoiler]I so apologize for the scathing sarcasm here, but the more I think about the responses to those questions the more angry and confused I simply become at what exact thought processes are going on at wizards. Really guys, how often do you have to republish stuff from the god damn PHB? You're already doing it multiple times coming up AGAIN with the fighter/cleric etc things from the canceled book. Isn't it just a little bit fair and okay to consider giving the classes that have been largely ignored something? Anything?[/spoiler]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aegeri, post: 5490210, member: 78116"] Yeah just think of those [I]poor players[/I] making PHB1 characters, with all their billions of feats and options available. One can't bear the thought of publishing any other feat or powers in the CB as long as the PHB classes are well supported. Who cares how much is published for those under supported classes anyway? Nobody plays them because they have hardly any options to begin with! Why on earth would giving them cool new options do anything? I mean just think of the poor fighters who may see content for other classes cluttering up their CB. Won't someone think of them and all their options they already have? Clearly what we need is someone to describe how to reflavor the existing power cleave, into hitting an enemy and farting so fouly upon another opponent that it gives up the fight and simply dies. [I]This[/I] is what we need more of. Not mechanical support for several classes, which really could warrant some support. Support that would not add any more feat/power bloat to characters that are - by definition - feat/power bloated already anyway. I mean it's not like Wizards would be releasing an entire book next month with more powers for the Wizard, the PHB1 class with some of the most support in the entire... [I]Oh... Wait[/I].... [spoiler]I so apologize for the scathing sarcasm here, but the more I think about the responses to those questions the more angry and confused I simply become at what exact thought processes are going on at wizards. Really guys, how often do you have to republish stuff from the god damn PHB? You're already doing it multiple times coming up AGAIN with the fighter/cleric etc things from the canceled book. Isn't it just a little bit fair and okay to consider giving the classes that have been largely ignored something? Anything?[/spoiler] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dragon 397: Letters To The Editor Up
Top