Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Riastlin" data-source="post: 5490454" data-attributes="member: 94022">This goes a bit to the Legends & Lore article this week as well.  They talk about complexity and to me, fighter is one of the hardest classes to make now in some ways.  The options are just so many that its hard to wrap your head around it unless a) you already have a pretty clear idea of what you want to do going in and b) already know which powers and feats will get you to that idea.  Of course, if you already know a and b then the number of options really don't matter. By contrast, as others have said, I would have no problem with additional seeker or runepriest content.  I confess that I don't know much about seekers since the concept didn't really appeal to me personally, but with runepriests its pretty much "Oh are you defiant or wrathful?"  and that answer will make it so that everyone has a pretty good idea what you do (assuming they are familiar with runepriests of course).  A third build and some feats for both of these classes would go a long way. I also agree that the statement "we are looking for articles that explain how to get more out of what you already have" is pretty damn vague and confusing, which probably explains why these writers are in "short supply".  I mean, do we really need an article that suggests targeting minions with the cleave?  Or telling the wizard to put his most debilitating conditions on the biggest threat?  Perhaps there is a need for some content along those lines (would be useful to new players perhaps), but a little would likely go a long way there. And yes, I agree that being as this is a free article, its not DDi content.  Additionally, placing it on the front page does make it easier to find.</blockquote>

Verification