Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dragon Compendium Table of Contents
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Erik Mona" data-source="post: 2615682" data-attributes="member: 2174"><p>Honestly, yeah. It was probably too big and too much for the Shackled City book. Sales on the product are decent, but I suspect that the Dragon Compendium will sell better because it is aimed at both DMs and players and because it has a more affordable price point. Before the release of the Shackled City book, I wouldn't have thought price point would be such a sticky issue, but I do now.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's irrelevant. The book was slated as a 256-pager, solicited as a 256-pager, etc. There's actually a business to this, and the profit margins on a slimmer book are often higher. You may have noticed that Wizards has standardized its hardcover size and price, and there's a reason for it. As I said before, there are hundreds of pages of excellent material. Some of that stuff wasn't going to make the cut for the first volume.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>They'll probably get it eventually, just not in this volume. And if they don't know it exists, what difference does it make if they get it in volume 1 or in volume 5? The answer is that it makes no difference.</p><p></p><p>The "general audience" to which I refer consists not only of people who have been subscribing to the magazine since The Strategic Review, but also to people who aren't interested in purchasing a monthly magazine (for whatever reason) but who might be interested in a compilation of some of the better material from that source. It's also aimed at recent subscribers and readers who complain that the 3.0 and 3.5 stuff published to date is too diffuse, too spread out over their various issues to reference handily.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's because it's true.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I thought "pardoning the hyperbole" went part and parcel with reading your posts at all.</p><p></p><p>I've already explained why we didn't put the Nine Hells articles in the first volume. If that explanation ain't good enough for you, there's really not a lot I can do to change your mind.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I am confident in the quality of the material that will appear in the first volume just as I am confident that enough high-quality material exists that we can fill several more. However, our current agreement with WotC includes only this first book, and future volumes are predicated upon its sales success. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You lecturing someone about sophistry is probably the most amusing thing I've read all week. Thanks for that, old chum.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And rain, to date, is still wet.</p><p></p><p>--Erik</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Erik Mona, post: 2615682, member: 2174"] Honestly, yeah. It was probably too big and too much for the Shackled City book. Sales on the product are decent, but I suspect that the Dragon Compendium will sell better because it is aimed at both DMs and players and because it has a more affordable price point. Before the release of the Shackled City book, I wouldn't have thought price point would be such a sticky issue, but I do now. It's irrelevant. The book was slated as a 256-pager, solicited as a 256-pager, etc. There's actually a business to this, and the profit margins on a slimmer book are often higher. You may have noticed that Wizards has standardized its hardcover size and price, and there's a reason for it. As I said before, there are hundreds of pages of excellent material. Some of that stuff wasn't going to make the cut for the first volume. They'll probably get it eventually, just not in this volume. And if they don't know it exists, what difference does it make if they get it in volume 1 or in volume 5? The answer is that it makes no difference. The "general audience" to which I refer consists not only of people who have been subscribing to the magazine since The Strategic Review, but also to people who aren't interested in purchasing a monthly magazine (for whatever reason) but who might be interested in a compilation of some of the better material from that source. It's also aimed at recent subscribers and readers who complain that the 3.0 and 3.5 stuff published to date is too diffuse, too spread out over their various issues to reference handily. That's because it's true. I thought "pardoning the hyperbole" went part and parcel with reading your posts at all. I've already explained why we didn't put the Nine Hells articles in the first volume. If that explanation ain't good enough for you, there's really not a lot I can do to change your mind. I am confident in the quality of the material that will appear in the first volume just as I am confident that enough high-quality material exists that we can fill several more. However, our current agreement with WotC includes only this first book, and future volumes are predicated upon its sales success. You lecturing someone about sophistry is probably the most amusing thing I've read all week. Thanks for that, old chum. And rain, to date, is still wet. --Erik [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dragon Compendium Table of Contents
Top